libertas: BUG: unable to handle paging request
Dan Williams
dcbw at redhat.com
Thu Jan 8 17:35:12 EST 2009
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 11:41 -0800, Andrey Yurovsky wrote:
> Hi Dario. In my case I see the oops when iwconfig issues the
> SIOCGIWFREQ icotl and thus lbs_get_freq() is executed. Pulling out
> the CMD_802_11_GET_LOG doesn't change anything in this respect.
>
> Right now I am trying to understand why the functions in wext.c access
> priv with:
>
> struct lbs_private *priv = dev->priv;
They probably just got forgotten or something during the conversion.
They should be using the same methods as everything else, really, since
it's just a netdev and they are trying to access the private driver
data.
Dan
> while the rest of the driver uses the netdev macros, for example:
>
> struct lbs_private *priv = netdev_priv(to_net_dev(dev));
>
> after the commit in question, or
>
> struct lbs_private *priv = to_net_dev(dev)->priv;
>
> before the commit in question. Converting the WEXT callbacks to use
> the netdev macros doesn't seem to solve the problem. Thanks,
>
> -Andrey
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Dario Vlah <dario at eecs.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > Hi Andrey,
> >
> > I ran into some trouble with the GET_LOG command on the jax10 device, which
> > happens to be called by iwconfig. Could that be related? What if you
> > disable the GET_LOG call?
> >
> > In my case issuing that command results in the firmware returning bogus
> > values such as negative buffer sizes which end up crashing the kernel.
> >
> > --dario
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Andrey Yurovsky wrote:
> >
> >> Hmm, I do see the problem start at
> >> 29726d85d7b98558a8bc8e69b859bf12e1347f9f and after, but I don't think
> >> that I'm right with my analysis, especially since the OOPS happens in
> >> wext.c and the functions there (namely lbs_get_freq) use netdev->priv
> >> directly. I apologize for the noise but there is still something
> >> wrong here that I'm trying to understand better.
> >>
> >> -Andrey
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Andrey Yurovsky <andrey at cozybit.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The commit that caused this regression is
> >>> 29726d85d7b98558a8bc8e69b859bf12e1347f9f "netdevice libertas: Fix
> >>> directly reference of netdev->priv" by Wang Chen. It probably causes
> >>> a problem with netdev->priv's offset and then we get a pointer
> >>> dereference problem when lbs_get_freq() tries to use its priv data.
> >>>
> >>> -Andrey
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Andrey Yurovsky <andrey at cozybit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hello. I noticed that the libertas driver causes a kernel oops in
> >>>> more recent wireless-testing kernels (I am bisecting right now to
> >>>> narrow this down). To reproduce, load the driver and run iwconfig,
> >>>> causing lbs_get_freq() to be called.
> >>>>
> >>>> So far I know that this problem doesn't exist at the 2.6.28-rc2 tag
> >>>> (commit 0173a3265b228da319ceb9c1ec6a5682fd1b2d92) but I have seen it
> >>>> in -rc7 and up through today's wireless-testing. It seems that
> >>>> there's a regression somewhere after -rc2. I've reproduced this with
> >>>> the USB hardware as well as an SDIO board.
> >>>>
> >>>> [ 118.571205] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 00001e01
> >>>> [ 118.578500] IP: [<c81fddda>] lbs_get_freq+0x1a/0x160 [libertas]
> >>>> [ 118.585417] *pde = 00000000
> >>>> [ 118.588877] Oops: 0000 [#1]
> >>>> [ 118.592092] last sysfs file: /sys/block/ram9/range
> >>>> [ 118.592385] Modules linked in: usb8xxx libertas lib80211
> >>>> [ 118.592385]
> >>>> [ 118.592385] Pid: 2317, comm: iwconfig Not tainted (2.6.28-wl #65)
> >>>> Uknown
> >>>> [ 118.592385] EIP: 0060:[<c81fddda>] EFLAGS: 00010293 CPU: 0
> >>>> [ 118.592385] EIP is at lbs_get_freq+0x1a/0x160 [libertas]
> >>>> [ 118.592385] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 00000000 ECX: c6891ef8 EDX: c6891e98
> >>>> [ 118.592385] ESI: c6891ef8 EDI: c6891ef8 EBP: c7295000 ESP: c6891e10
> >>>> [ 118.592385] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
> >>>> [ 118.592385] Process iwconfig (pid: 2317, ti=c6890000 task=c7349880
> >>>> task.ti=c6890000)
> >>>> [ 118.592385] Stack:
> >>>> [ 118.592385] c8201b4b c6891ef8 00000010 ffffffa1 00008b05 c038aa20
> >>>> 00000000 c03c691c
> >>>> [ 118.592385] 00000000 c04bc7e0 c0301287 b7f01d70 c68ce000 c6895000
> >>>> c04c8260 00000c04
> >>>> [ 118.592385] c68c7b7c 00000000 c7295000 c6891ee8 c0300325 c6891ee8
> >>>> c7295000 c6891ee8
> >>>> [ 118.592385] Call Trace:
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c8201b4b>] lbs_get_name+0x2b/0xb0 [libertas]
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c038aa20>] ioctl_standard_call+0x60/0x3a0
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c0301287>] netif_receive_skb+0x1d7/0x3e0
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c0300325>] __dev_get_by_name+0x75/0x90
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c0300325>] __dev_get_by_name+0x75/0x90
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c038a687>] wext_handle_ioctl+0x157/0x230
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c81fddc0>] lbs_get_freq+0x0/0x160 [libertas]
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c03034c4>] dev_ioctl+0x304/0x4f0
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c02ffdd2>] net_rx_action+0x92/0x140
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c027ca89>] pty_write+0x39/0x60
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c02f4280>] sock_ioctl+0x0/0x260
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c017e27f>] vfs_ioctl+0x1f/0x70
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c017e65b>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x24b/0x490
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c011654e>] update_curr+0x13e/0x190
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c0117fab>] set_next_entity+0x2b/0x70
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c0397c64>] schedule+0x1b4/0x350
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c017e906>] sys_ioctl+0x66/0x70
> >>>> [ 118.592385] [<c0103cd2>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> >>>> [ 118.592385] Code: e9 38 ff ff ff 8d b6 00 00 00 00 8d bf 00 00 00
> >>>> 00 56 89 ce 53 83 ec 0c 8b 98 a4 01 00 00 a1 80 19 22 c8 83 e0 21 83
> >>>> f8 21 74 42 <0f> b6 8b 01 1e 00 00 31 d2 89 d8 e8 a6 fe ff ff 85 c0 0f
> >>>> 84 cd
> >>>> [ 118.592385] EIP: [<c81fddda>] lbs_get_freq+0x1a/0x160 [libertas]
> >>>> SS:ESP 0068:c6891e10
> >>>> [ 118.594153] ---[ end trace f426cd49b2b378f4 ]---
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> libertas-dev mailing list
> >> libertas-dev at lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/libertas-dev
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> libertas-dev mailing list
> libertas-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/libertas-dev
More information about the libertas-dev
mailing list