[LEDE-DEV] A state of network acceleration / test on Archer C7 v4
Joel Wirāmu Pauling
joel at aenertia.net
Mon Jan 29 13:56:24 PST 2018
Sorry to keep following up with this;
the other thing it gives you is things like sysctl parameters, kernel,
tcp window scaling (pre and post test) and a bunch of per stream and
aggregated metadata relating to the entire suite. In a nice self
contained gzip that can produce lovely graphs using matplotlib.
Basically a repeatable standardized test with all the things you might
be interested in captured for distribution/reference.
flent-gui provides a nice interactive graphical interface (but you can
just as easily using the cli) for interacting with the datasets.
-Joel
On 30 January 2018 at 10:52, Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel at aenertia.net> wrote:
> In terms of what you need on the target netserver/netperf from ipkg is
> tiny and is all you need.
>
> On 30 January 2018 at 10:51, Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel at aenertia.net> wrote:
>> FLENT + RRUL testing is 4 up 4 down TCP streams with 4 different QoS
>> Markings, and then 4 different QoS Marked UDP probes and ICMP.
>>
>> It gives you a measure of how much the CPU and Network path can cope
>> with load conditions, which are more realistic for everyday use.
>>
>> iperf3 isn't going to give you any measure of that.
>>
>> On 30 January 2018 at 10:48, Karl Palsson <karlp at tweak.net.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Joel Wirāmu Pauling <joel at aenertia.net> wrote:
>>>> Any chance I can convince you to use netperf + FLENT for doing
>>>> your tests rather than iperf(3)?
>>>>
>>>> flent.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> For those playing at home, could you elaborate on _why_? What do
>>> you expect to change? By what sort of percentage?
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Karl Palsson
More information about the Lede-dev
mailing list