[LEDE-DEV] A state of network acceleration / test on Archer C7 v4
Joel Wirāmu Pauling
joel at aenertia.net
Mon Jan 29 11:58:18 PST 2018
Any chance I can convince you to use netperf + FLENT for doing your
tests rather than iperf(3)?
flent.org
-Joel
On 30 January 2018 at 03:12, Michael Richardson <mcr at sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby.net> wrote:
> >> So that means that you have to do the performance testing for routing
> >> between two subnets.
>
> > Hi,
>
> > With wired, firewall off and using routing (no MASQUERADE, explicit LAN
> > route added on the NUC via WAN IP):
>
> Thanks for doing this again.
> This is Openwrt/LEDE, or the stock firmware?
> I think Openwrt.
>
> > - IPv4 590+ Mbit/s up and 690+ Mbit/s down
> > - IPv6 270+ Mbit/s same both ways
>
> > So without NAT/conntrack we gain about 50% on IPv4 and we're closer to
> > line rate.
>
> I wonder why the asymmetry.
>
> > For the record I tested without the router to check iperf3 my setup and
> > IPv4 and IPv6 are 910+ Mbit/s both ways.
>
> > Sincerely,
>
> > Laurent
>
> > PS: kernel is 4.9.77 on the archer (not 4.4, thinko in my first mail)
> > NUC and laptop are running 4.9 debian stretch too.
>
>
> --
> ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
> ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
> ] mcr at sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>
More information about the Lede-dev
mailing list