[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] iproute2: Add support for ports in xfrm on SCTP

[Philip Prindeville]

Why did we even do this to begin with?


> On Feb 15, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de> wrote:
> 
> Remove this old patch which prevents showing the xfrm ports for SCTP
> 
> This was added in commit 60c1f0f64d23 ("finally move buildroot-ng to trunk")
> ---
> .../network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch   | 18 ------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 package/network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch
> 
> diff --git a/package/network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch b/package/network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch
> deleted file mode 100644
> index e23fbcd77d..0000000000
> --- a/package/network/utils/iproute2/patches/006-no_sctp.patch
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
> ---- a/ip/ipxfrm.c
> -+++ b/ip/ipxfrm.c
> -@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@ void xfrm_selector_print(struct xfrm_sel
> -    switch (sel->proto) {
> -    case IPPROTO_TCP:
> -    case IPPROTO_UDP:
> --    case IPPROTO_SCTP:
> -    case IPPROTO_DCCP:
> -    default: /* XXX */
> -        if (sel->sport_mask)
> -@@ -1329,7 +1328,6 @@ static int xfrm_selector_upspec_parse(st
> -        switch (sel->proto) {
> -        case IPPROTO_TCP:
> -        case IPPROTO_UDP:
> --        case IPPROTO_SCTP:
> -        case IPPROTO_DCCP:
> -        case IPPROTO_IP: /* to allow shared SA for different protocols */
> -            break;
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev