[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH] procd: service_handle_set() should use SERVICE_SET_NAME rather than SERVICE_ATTR_NAME

[Mathias Kresin]

2017-10-04 12:49 GMT+02:00  <pme.lebleu at gmail.com>:
> From: Pierre Lebleu <pme.lebleu at gmail.com>
>

^^^ and here should be an explanation why SERVICE_SET_NAME should be
used in favour of SERVICE_ATTR_NAME.

> Signed-off-by: Pierre Lebleu <pme.lebleu at gmail.com>
> ---
>  service/service.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/service/service.c b/service/service.c
> index 02a29fa..9c798aa 100644
> --- a/service/service.c
> +++ b/service/service.c
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ service_handle_set(struct ubus_context *ctx, struct ubus_object *obj,
>         int ret;
>
>         blobmsg_parse(service_set_attrs, __SERVICE_SET_MAX, tb, blob_data(msg), blob_len(msg));
> -       cur = tb[SERVICE_ATTR_NAME];
> +       cur = tb[SERVICE_SET_NAME];
>         if (!cur)
>                 return UBUS_STATUS_INVALID_ARGUMENT;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev