[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH 1/5] base-files: introduce /lib/functions/board.sh
Felix Fietkau
nbd at nbd.name
Tue May 2 09:18:15 PDT 2017
On 2017-05-02 17:53, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 2 May 2017 at 10:25, Felix Fietkau <nbd at nbd.name> wrote:
>> board_name already exists, and I've already converted e.g. the lantiq
>> target to use it directly from functions.sh.
>> board_model is not used, neither is the model function from any of the
>> messy copy&paste target files. Which means you're arguing for having a
>> separate source file for a function that in its current form only has
>> one single line of code.
>>
>> In my opinion the best course of action is to nuke your patches 1-3
>> completely, rework patch 4 to adjust the generic code as proposed, and
>> adjust patch 5 to simply use the board_name() from /lib/functions.sh
>>
>> Just ignore the board_model nonsense, it does not need to be part of the
>> shell 'API' at all.
>
> I'm talking about board_name, not model. I've added model to the file
> only because /tmp/sysinfo/model exists.
> You say that including 365 (non-functional) lines is better than 15
> (functional) when you only need board_name? I cannot understand
> that...
I'd say almost all places that will use board_name() already need
/lib/functions.sh.
/lib/functions/uci-defaults.sh already includes it, so do many other
core include files.
Among the files touched by your rework, I think there is only one file
that does not already include functions.sh.
In functions.sh we already do have quite a few functions that are used
only in some places and not in others. Putting every small piece into a
separate include file would make things messy very quickly.
This may seem like a minor detail to you, but I want to make sure that
we don't add more unnecessary clutter here.
- Felix
More information about the Lede-dev
mailing list