[LEDE-DEV] MT7621 support Jumbo frames

Jaap Buurman jaapbuurman at gmail.com
Sat Apr 22 04:53:57 PDT 2017


I have never applied patches before, so I am probably making mistakes.
The first problem I'm running into, is that it is trying to patch the
following file:

/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7620.h

However, such a file does not exist in that path in my build_dir. I
can find gsw_mt7620.c and gsw_mt7620.o files just fine in the
aforementioned path, but not the .h file it is trying to patch. To
which branch does the patch apply cleanly? I am currently trying to
patch the master branch. Should I try the 17.01 branch instead?

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Jaap Buurman <jaapbuurman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, that sounds even better :) I will try to compile and test this
> patch tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Will let you know if it
> works. Thanks again for the effort you're putting into this!
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Gaetano Catalli
> <gaetano.catalli at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm still working on this since I would like to raise the limit up to
>> 9KB if possible. Please, let me know if this works for you.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Jaap Buurman <jaapbuurman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Wow, this is perfect. Thank you very much. I will try to use this
>>> patch and compile my own image with up to 2kb frame support. Do you
>>> have any plans on submitting this as a PR to the LEDE git?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Gaetano Catalli
>>> <gaetano.catalli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I've been working on this for a while. Apparently the embedded 5-port
>>>> gigabit switch is able to handle packets with size up to 15KB. On the
>>>> contrary, the GMAC, to which the switch is attached, has a limit of
>>>> 2KB. The following is a patch that changes the max recv frame length
>>>> to 2KB and allows to set the MTU up to that value. It is based on
>>>> kernel 4.4.7.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gaetano Catalli <gaetano.catalli at gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7620.h  |  6 +++++
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7621.c  | 13 +++++++----
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h |  1 +
>>>>  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/soc_mt7621.c  |  2 +-
>>>>  5 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7620.h
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7620.h
>>>> index dcef9a8..ce3cd10 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7620.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7620.h
>>>> @@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
>>>>  #define GSW_REG_ISR 0x700c
>>>>  #define GSW_REG_GPC1 0x7014
>>>>
>>>> +#define GSW_REG_MAC_P0_MCR 0x100
>>>> +#define GSW_REG_MAC_P1_MCR 0x200
>>>> +
>>>> +// Global MAC control register
>>>> +#define GSW_REG_GMACCR 0x30E0
>>>> +
>>>>  #define SYSC_REG_CHIP_REV_ID 0x0c
>>>>  #define SYSC_REG_CFG1 0x14
>>>>  #define RST_CTRL_MCM BIT(2)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7621.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7621.c
>>>> index 96280b4..db5d56d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7621.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/gsw_mt7621.c
>>>> @@ -99,17 +99,20 @@ static void mt7621_hw_init(struct mt7620_gsw *gsw,
>>>> struct device_node *np)
>>>>   usleep_range(10, 20);
>>>>
>>>>   if ((rt_sysc_r32(SYSC_REG_CHIP_REV_ID) & 0xFFFF) == 0x0101) {
>>>> - /* (GE1, Force 1000M/FD, FC ON, MAX_RX_LENGTH 1536) */
>>>> - mtk_switch_w32(gsw, 0x2105e30b, 0x100);
>>>> + /* (GE1, Force 1000M/FD, FC ON, MAX_RX_LENGTH 2k) */
>>>> + mtk_switch_w32(gsw, 0x2305e30b, GSW_REG_MAC_P0_MCR);
>>>>   mt7530_mdio_w32(gsw, 0x3600, 0x5e30b);
>>>>   } else {
>>>> - /* (GE1, Force 1000M/FD, FC ON, MAX_RX_LENGTH 1536) */
>>>> - mtk_switch_w32(gsw, 0x2105e33b, 0x100);
>>>> + /* (GE1, Force 1000M/FD, FC ON, MAX_RX_LENGTH 2k) */
>>>> + mtk_switch_w32(gsw, 0x2305e33b, GSW_REG_MAC_P0_MCR);
>>>>   mt7530_mdio_w32(gsw, 0x3600, 0x5e33b);
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   /* (GE2, Link down) */
>>>> - mtk_switch_w32(gsw, 0x8000, 0x200);
>>>> + mtk_switch_w32(gsw, 0x8000, GSW_REG_MAC_P1_MCR);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Set switch max RX frame length to 2k */
>>>> + mt7530_mdio_w32(gsw, GSW_REG_GMACCR, 0x3F0B);
>>>>
>>>>   /* Enable Port 6, P5 as GMAC5, P5 disable */
>>>>   val = mt7530_mdio_r32(gsw, 0x7804);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>>>> index 48eda44..5edafa6 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
>>>> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>>>>  #include "mdio.h"
>>>>  #include "ethtool.h"
>>>>
>>>> -#define MAX_RX_LENGTH 1536
>>>> +#define MAX_RX_LENGTH 2048
>>>>  #define FE_RX_ETH_HLEN (VLAN_ETH_HLEN + VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN)
>>>>  #define FE_RX_HLEN (NET_SKB_PAD + FE_RX_ETH_HLEN + NET_IP_ALIGN)
>>>>  #define DMA_DUMMY_DESC 0xffffffff
>>>> @@ -1358,11 +1358,29 @@ static int fe_do_ioctl(struct net_device *dev,
>>>> struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd)
>>>>   return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>> +static int fe_set_mtu(struct fe_priv* priv, int new_mtu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int frag_size = fe_max_frag_size(new_mtu);
>>>> + u32 fwd_cfg;
>>>> +
>>>> + fe_stop(priv->netdev);
>>>> + fwd_cfg = fe_r32(FE_GDMA1_FWD_CFG);
>>>> + if (new_mtu <= ETH_DATA_LEN) {
>>>> + fwd_cfg &= ~FE_GDM1_JMB_EN;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + fwd_cfg &= ~(FE_GDM1_JMB_LEN_MASK << FE_GDM1_JMB_LEN_SHIFT);
>>>> + fwd_cfg |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(frag_size, 1024) <<
>>>> + FE_GDM1_JMB_LEN_SHIFT) | FE_GDM1_JMB_EN;
>>>> + }
>>>> + fe_w32(fwd_cfg, FE_GDMA1_FWD_CFG);
>>>> +
>>>> + return fe_open(priv->netdev);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>  static int fe_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int new_mtu)
>>>>  {
>>>>   struct fe_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>>   int frag_size, old_mtu;
>>>> - u32 fwd_cfg;
>>>>
>>>>   if (!(priv->flags & FE_FLAG_JUMBO_FRAME))
>>>>   return eth_change_mtu(dev, new_mtu);
>>>> @@ -1389,18 +1407,10 @@ static int fe_change_mtu(struct net_device
>>>> *dev, int new_mtu)
>>>>   if (!netif_running(dev))
>>>>   return 0;
>>>>
>>>> - fe_stop(dev);
>>>> - fwd_cfg = fe_r32(FE_GDMA1_FWD_CFG);
>>>> - if (new_mtu <= ETH_DATA_LEN) {
>>>> - fwd_cfg &= ~FE_GDM1_JMB_EN;
>>>> - } else {
>>>> - fwd_cfg &= ~(FE_GDM1_JMB_LEN_MASK << FE_GDM1_JMB_LEN_SHIFT);
>>>> - fwd_cfg |= (DIV_ROUND_UP(frag_size, 1024) <<
>>>> - FE_GDM1_JMB_LEN_SHIFT) | FE_GDM1_JMB_EN;
>>>> - }
>>>> - fe_w32(fwd_cfg, FE_GDMA1_FWD_CFG);
>>>> + if (priv->soc->set_mtu)
>>>> + return priv->soc->set_mtu(priv, new_mtu);
>>>>
>>>> - return fe_open(dev);
>>>> + return fe_set_mtu(priv, new_mtu);
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  static const struct net_device_ops fe_netdev_ops = {
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>>>> index d5f8b87..3acc2c1 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h
>>>> @@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ struct fe_soc_data {
>>>>   void (*reset_fe)(void);
>>>>   void (*set_mac)(struct fe_priv *priv, unsigned char *mac);
>>>>   int (*fwd_config)(struct fe_priv *priv);
>>>> + int (*set_mtu)(struct fe_priv *priv, int new_mtu);
>>>>   void (*tx_dma)(struct fe_tx_dma *txd);
>>>>   int (*switch_init)(struct fe_priv *priv);
>>>>   int (*switch_config)(struct fe_priv *priv);
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/soc_mt7621.c
>>>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/soc_mt7621.c
>>>> index 1609a3e..f95c354 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/soc_mt7621.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/soc_mt7621.c
>>>> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void mt7621_init_data(struct fe_soc_data *data,
>>>>
>>>>   priv->flags = FE_FLAG_PADDING_64B | FE_FLAG_RX_2B_OFFSET |
>>>>   FE_FLAG_RX_SG_DMA | FE_FLAG_NAPI_WEIGHT |
>>>> - FE_FLAG_HAS_SWITCH;
>>>> + FE_FLAG_HAS_SWITCH | FE_FLAG_JUMBO_FRAME;
>>>>
>>>>   netdev->hw_features = NETIF_F_IP_CSUM | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
>>>>   NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_TSO |
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Jaap Buurman <jaapbuurman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I am able to test this on my DIR-860l. I could try to compile my own
>>>>> build to test this, but I am no C programmer myself. Am I correct in
>>>>> the following post about how to set the flag to allow for jumbo frames
>>>>> to be set?: https://forum.lede-project.org/t/build-for-the-d-link-dir-860l/948/40?u=mushoz
>>>>> If so, I will be able to apply the patch myself and test it. I could
>>>>> then send a PR if the tests are successful.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jaap Buurman
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Milan Kočvara <milankocvara at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>> if someone do a testing patch for jumboFrames, I can lend a helping
>>>>>> hand with testing on EdgeRouter X. I think MT7621 know JumboFrames,
>>>>>> because of Ubiquiti FMW allow to set MTU 1536B
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-04-10 2:06 GMT+02:00  <rosenp at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> Probably was not in the interest of the driver writers. Based on the
>>>>>>> copyrights though, it's mostly LEDE/OpenWRT developers. Try modifying
>>>>>>> the code to test if jumbo frames work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 2017-04-09 at 21:20 +0200, Jaap Buurman wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I found the message below in a conversation from back in August, 2016
>>>>>>>> in this mailinglist. I did not find a reply to this question. Has
>>>>>>>> there ever been one? Or does anyone else happen to know the answer to
>>>>>>>> this question? Thank you very much in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jaap Buurman
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> August, 2016 message:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in the MT7621 ethernet driver code
>>>>>>>> (drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/soc_mt7621.c) the FE_FLAG_JUMBO_FRAME
>>>>>>>> flag is not during the device initialization. This prevents the user
>>>>>>>> to set an MTU greater than 1500. Is this correct? Does MT7621 support
>>>>>>>> jumbo frames?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> gaetano catalli
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> gaetano catalli



More information about the Lede-dev mailing list