[LEDE-DEV] [PATCH v3 1/5] ipq806x/nbg6817: add support for ZyXEL NBG6817

Felix Fietkau nbd at nbd.name
Sun Oct 23 07:39:53 PDT 2016


On 2016-10-23 16:38, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2016-10-23 16:25, André Valentin wrote:
>> CPU: 2x1.8GHz ARM, RAM: 512MiB
>> Storage: 4MiB serial Flash, 3.9GiB MMC
>> NIC: 2x1GBit/s, Switch with 5 external and 2 internal ports
>> WiFi: Dualband, ath10k 2.4GHz, 5GHz MU-MIMO
>> 
>> For installation copy xx-mmcblk0p4-kernel.bin and xx-mmcblk0p5-rootfs-full.bin
>> to device. Then run:
>> cat xx-mmcblk0p4-kernel.bin > /dev/mmc0blk0p4
>> cat xx-mmcblk0p5-rootfs-full.bin > /dev/mmc0blk0p5
>> reboot -f
>> 
>> For debugging serial console is easily visible on board, no soldering needed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: André Valentin <avalentin at marcant.net>
>> ---
>>  .../linux/ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/01_leds   |   5 +
>>  .../ipq806x/base-files/etc/board.d/02_network      |   7 +
>>  .../etc/hotplug.d/firmware/11-ath10k-caldata       |   6 +
>>  target/linux/ipq806x/base-files/lib/ipq806x.sh     |   3 +
>>  target/linux/ipq806x/config-4.4                    |  18 +-
>>  .../arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8065-nbg6817.dts     | 341 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  target/linux/ipq806x/image/Makefile                |  26 +-
>>  .../linux/ipq806x/patches-4.4/800-devicetree.patch |   3 +-
>>  8 files changed, 401 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 target/linux/ipq806x/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8065-nbg6817.dts
>> 
> 
>> diff --git a/target/linux/ipq806x/image/Makefile b/target/linux/ipq806x/image/Makefile
>> index b74f1a7..e7d4bf2 100644
>> --- a/target/linux/ipq806x/image/Makefile
>> +++ b/target/linux/ipq806x/image/Makefile
>> -TARGET_DEVICES += AP148 AP148-legacy C2600 D7800 DB149 EA8500 R7500 R7500v2 R7800
>> +define Device/NBG6817
>> +	DEVICE_DTS := qcom-ipq8065-nbg6817
>> +	KERNEL_SIZE := 4194304
>> +	ROOTFS_SIZE := 64M
>> +	BLOCKSIZE := 64k
>> +	BOARD_NAME := nbg6817
>> +	DEVICE_TITLE := ZyXEL NBG6817
>> +	DEVICE_PACKAGES := ath10k-firmware-qca9984 e2fsprogs losetup
> You can drop losetup, it is not necessary.
Sorry, I missed the fact that you were using it in sysupgrade. Will do a
more detailed review of that.

- Felix




More information about the Lede-dev mailing list