[LEDE-DEV] iw / ath9k / mediatek / strange values for 'signal'
Bastian Bittorf
bb at npl.de
Fri Oct 21 14:02:42 PDT 2016
we use the signal reported from 'iw' for some actions
and I can see them beeing inconsistent or maybe even
wrong calculated (strange values are marked)
root at box:~ iw dev wlan0-1 station get 60:5b:b4:9a:e4:8b
Station 60:5b:b4:9a:e4:8b (on wlan0-1)
inactive time: 10 ms
rx bytes: 820080
rx packets: 6018
tx bytes: 13855366
tx packets: 9884
tx retries: 1696
tx failed: 0
*** signal: -4 [-59, -59, -54] dBm
signal avg: -53 [-57, -57, -52] dBm
tx bitrate: 58.5 MBit/s MCS 6
rx bitrate: 130.0 MBit/s MCS 15
expected throughput: 30.120Mbps
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
preamble: short
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
connected time: 161 seconds
root at box:~ iw dev wlan0-1 station get 60:5b:b4:9a:e4:8b
Station 60:5b:b4:9a:e4:8b (on wlan0-1)
inactive time: 70 ms
rx bytes: 1262941
rx packets: 8861
tx bytes: 19504789
tx packets: 14266
tx retries: 2572
tx failed: 0
*** signal: -95 [-58, -58, -53] dBm
signal avg: -55 [-56, -57, -52] dBm
tx bitrate: 78.0 MBit/s MCS 12
rx bitrate: 117.0 MBit/s MCS 14
expected throughput: 35.613Mbps
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
preamble: short
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
connected time: 292 seconds
root at box:~ iw dev wlan0-1 station get 60:5b:b4:9a:e4:8b
Station 60:5b:b4:9a:e4:8b (on wlan0-1)
inactive time: 20 ms
rx bytes: 2460373
rx packets: 9789
tx bytes: 19619950
tx packets: 14761
tx retries: 2599
tx failed: 0
*** signal: -20 [-59, -58, -53] dBm
signal avg: -85 [-57, -58, -53] dBm
tx bitrate: 117.0 MBit/s MCS 14
rx bitrate: 52.0 MBit/s MCS 11
expected throughput: 42.296Mbps
authorized: yes
authenticated: yes
preamble: short
WMM/WME: yes
MFP: no
TDLS peer: no
connected time: 313 seconds
beside these 3 shots, i can see also values for signal of:
"8" (positive!) and "-126"...
i can see this with different versions of OpenWRT and LEDE
and with ath9k and Mediathek. What can I do for debugging this
better? The connected station is *not* moving.
bye, bastian
More information about the Lede-dev
mailing list