[LEDE-DEV] A note on my use of RFC

[Daniel Curran-Dickinson]

On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 16:03 -0400, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote: 
> Hi all,
> 
> There seems to be some confusion because of the way I use RFC.  I've
> (unless otherwise stated in the PR) intended RFC for looking over code
> and commenting before I debug and test (e.g. to make sure the approach
> is even in the right ballpark).
> 
> I will try to make that clear in the PR from now on, since that seems to
> be non-standard usage and people expect RFC to be working code.

Also, since it seems to be non-standard usage I will use URFC (Untest
Request For Comments) so as to alert the reader it's not a standard RFC,
but is intended as code/design review before the code gets tested and
debugged.

Regards,

Daniel