[LEDE-DEV] OpenWRT tree vs LEDE tree

[Daniel Dickinson]

On 16-05-19 09:31 PM, Daniel Curran-Dickinson wrote:
> 
> Does that mean I think LEDE is perferct?  Definitely not, but I've
> already seen huge improvements compared to what was happening in
> openwrt, and a great deal more openness than was the case in openwrt.
> 
> Do I think there are potentially problems, like my, and others,
> impressions, that there is a fair amount of back channel (private) email
> that *isn't* part of the public discussion that I thing is contrary to
> the stated goal of transparency, if if the only reason is they think
> it's just trivial or trying to hash things out?  Then yes, I think there
> is *too much* back channel mail, and that if they're *serious* about
> transparency they will fix that, even if it's hard to adopt that working
> style.
> 
> You know I personally am not afraid to go on the record with my thoughts
> and opinions, and I think that kind of approach is what it takes to do
> transparency right, if it can be uncomfortable and keeps a history of
> thing one might wish were not on the record.
> 

If the concert is with spamming the list perhaps something like
lede-dev-talk for stuff that's for things like hashing things out and
'trivial' stuff, so that it's still on the public record (since the
stated goal is transparency).

Regards,

Daniel