[LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images

[David Lang]

I agree. There may be some devices with extremely small flash that can't fit 
luci, but otherwise I think it should be on the default images that people are 
pointed at.

Having a second set of images without luci isn't a bad idea, but if forced to 
choose, I would say they should have luci

David Lang

  On Wed, 29 Jun 2016, Adrian Panella 
wrote:

> Totally agree with the observation.
> +1 for including LuCI as default.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lede-dev [mailto:lede-dev-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of
> Jo-Philipp Wich
> Sent: miércoles, 29 de junio de 2016 09:54 a.m.
> To: lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] adding luci to snapshot images
>
> Hi,
>
> it would certainly help to bridge the gap until the #1 release and it would
> give more testing exposure to the ui...
>
> My observation on the matter is this:
> People who do *not* want to have the ui included are either building from
> source or using the IB anyway and those users *requiring* a ui tend to be
> unable to spin their own builds (no Linux os at hand, too hard, ...)
>
> So personally I'd lean toward adding LuCI to the snapshots but would await
> further feedback on it.
>
> ~ Jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lede-dev mailing list
> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>