[LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?

[L. D. Pinney]

It's a Development List ... no place for corporate agendas.

The problem is more pervasive than just TR-069.

It's about cross-posting and pushing forwards about who's going to the
corporate sponsored events and other drivel.

These things have little or nothing to do with the PRIMARY reason of a
Development List.

IF these people have something to contribute such as a [PATCH] this
would be correct mailing list...otherwise it's BS

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:14 PM, David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
> Like individuals, companies do things that benefit them. Almost all Open
> Source software development is done by people who benefit from the results.
> If benefiting from the results makes it that the LEDE project doesn't want
> to hear from you, the project will die _really_ fast.
>
> I hope your hostile attitude doesn't spread.
>
> David Lang
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:10:36 -0500
>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com>
>> To: David Lang <david at lang.hm>
>> Cc: LEDE Development List <lede-dev at lists.infradead.org>
>>
>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
>>
>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>> Yes of course large corporations are well known for altruistic behavior.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Lang <david at lang.hm> wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it really pushing a corporate agenda to coordinate efforts to make
>>> LEDE/OpenWRT support remote management protocols?
>>>
>>> Just because a company works on something doesn't make it evil.
>>>
>>> David Lang
>>>
>>> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, L. D. Pinney wrote:
>>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:29:08 -0500
>>>> From: L. D. Pinney <ldpinney at gmail.com>
>>>> To: LEDE Development List <lede-dev at lists.infradead.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [LEDE-DEV] TR-069 and OpenWrt discussion on these lists?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Postings to the LEDE Development List should be devoted to technical
>>>> development issues.
>>>>
>>>> Persons from prplfoundation et.al should respect conventional mail list
>>>> etiquette such as found here :
>>>>
>>>> http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php
>>>>
>>>> Pay particular attention to 4, 7, and 10 on the above etiquitte list.
>>>>
>>>> I see prplfoundation as a hostile takeover of LEDE / OpenWrt by a
>>>> corporate conspiracy.
>>>>
>>>> Free Software is meant to be free ...
>>>>
>>>> Free from the manipulation of governments and corporations.
>>>>
>>>> Pushing your corporate backed agenda on the Development List(s)
>>>> torques me off every time.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:31 PM, Eric Schultz
>>>> <eschultz at prplfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As we continue the TR-069 support discussion, I wanted to ask folks
>>>>> whether they want me to continue to cross post to these list in
>>>>> addition
>>>>> to the prplwrt list at openwrt at lists.prplfoundation.org. I have no
>>>>> problem doing either way, but I don't want to fill people's inbox will
>>>>> stuff they feel is off topic. Just wanted to get a sense of what people
>>>>> would prefer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric
>>>>> --
>>>>> Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
>>>>> http://www.prplfoundation.org
>>>>> eschultz at prplfoundation.org
>>>>> cell: 920-539-0404
>>>>> skype: ericschultzwi
>>>>> @EricPrpl
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lede-dev mailing list
>>>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>
>