[LEDE-DEV] ramips: image validator and board variants

John Crispin john at phrozen.org
Tue Dec 6 08:54:52 PST 2016



On 05/12/2016 10:17, Mathias Kresin wrote:
> Hey John, Hey Felix
> 
> I'm near to finished with porting the remaining ramips devices to the
> new image build code. While doing this, I might have spotted a ramips
> specific issue with the new image validation feature in regard of build
> variants of boards.
> 
> At the moment the build code of for example 4 MByte and 8 MByte flash
> variants of a single board uses the same SUPPORTED_DEVICES string, to
> match the name exported in /lib/ramips.sh. Albeit the situation is
> already way better than without any validation, it would allow to flash
> a 8 MByte image on a the board version with only 4 MByte flash.
> 
> I can only guess this solution/workaround/hack was chosen to avoid
> touching files which setup led related stuff. No idea why this
> limitation wasn't mentioned in the commit message.
> 
> To de-duplicate stuff on ramips, the LEDs are referenced as
> $board:color:name, where $board is the name exported by /lib/ramips.sh.
> In all cases, build variants of a board are sharing the device tree led
> node, which has the leds named like "asl26555:red:power" for the
> asl26555-8M and asl26555-16M.
> 
> My question is now, how to handle such cases?
> 
> a) use a shared SUPPORTED_DEVICES string and life with the 80% solution
> 
> b) add an exception for these boards and use the asl26555:color:name
> pattern instead of $board:color:name at the relevant places
> 
> c) there is another solution that I've missed
> 
> Mathias

ideally we can detect the difference between asl26555-8M and
asl26555-16M for the image flashing only. maybe we can add a third file
under /tmp/sysinfo/ and use it for the metadata stuff if present. if not
present fall back to the current code path

	John



More information about the Lede-dev mailing list