[FS#388] odhcpd: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on br-lan thus we don't an

[LEDE Bugs]

The following task has a new comment added:

FS#388 - odhcpd: A default route is present but there is no public prefix on br-lan thus we don't an
User who did this - Dave Täht (dtaht)

----------
root at lorna-gw:~# ip -6 route
default from 2001:558:6045:bd:c4f5:f41f:elide:297b via fe80::201:5cff:fe63:e446 dev eth0  proto static  metric 512  pref medium
default from 2601:646:4180:elided::/64 via fe80::201:5cff:fe63:e446 dev eth0  proto static  metric 512  pref medium
2601:646:4180:elided::/64 dev br-lan  proto static  metric 1024  pref medium
unreachable 2601:646:4180:elided::/64 dev lo  proto static  metric 2147483647  error -148 pref medium

I will be rebooting this box in a bit. In an earlier run, I WAS getting a /60 from upstream of me. Now I only have a /64 (and thus dhcpv6-pd should be refused) but I shouldn't lose all connectivity elsewhre. while being refused....

----------

More information can be found at the following URL:
https://bugs.lede-project.org/index.php?do=details&task_id=388#comment1264