[PATCH] riscv: KVM: Remove unnecessary vcpu kick

[项文成]

>From 30dd00f6886119ecc5c39b6b88f8617a57e598fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: BillXiang <xiangwencheng at lanxincomputing.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:45:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] riscv: KVM: Remove unnecessary vcpu kick

Hello everyone,
I'm wondering whether it's necessary to kick the virtual hart
after writing to the vsfile of IMSIC.
>From my understanding, writing to the vsfile should directly
forward the interrupt as MSI to the virtual hart. This means that
an additional kick should not be necessary, as it would cause the
vCPU to exit unnecessarily and potentially degrade performance.
I've tested this behavior in QEMU, and it seems to work perfectly
fine without the extra kick.
Would appreciate any insights or confirmation on this!
Best regards.

Signed-off-by: BillXiang <xiangwencheng at lanxincomputing.com>
---
 arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c
index a8085cd8215e..29ef9c2133a9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/aia_imsic.c
@@ -974,7 +974,6 @@ int kvm_riscv_vcpu_aia_imsic_inject(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,

        if (imsic->vsfile_cpu >= 0) {
                writel(iid, imsic->vsfile_va + IMSIC_MMIO_SETIPNUM_LE);
-               kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
        } else {
                eix = &imsic->swfile->eix[iid / BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)];
                set_bit(iid & (BITS_PER_TYPE(u64) - 1), eix->eip);
--
2.46.2