[RFC PATCH 05/15] iommu/riscv: use data structure instead of individual values
Andrew Jones
ajones at ventanamicro.com
Thu Nov 14 08:18:50 PST 2024
From: Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com>
The parameter will be increased when we need to set up more
bit fields in the device context. Use a data structure to
wrap them up.
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
---
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
index 3fe4ceba8dd3..9d7945dc3c24 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
@@ -1001,7 +1001,7 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iotlb_inval(struct riscv_iommu_domain *domain,
* interim translation faults.
*/
static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
- struct device *dev, u64 fsc, u64 ta)
+ struct device *dev, struct riscv_iommu_dc *new_dc)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_dc *dc;
@@ -1035,10 +1035,10 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
dc = riscv_iommu_get_dc(iommu, fwspec->ids[i]);
tc = READ_ONCE(dc->tc);
- tc |= ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
+ tc |= new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, fsc);
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, new_dc->fsc);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
/* Update device context, write TC.V as the last step. */
dma_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(dc->tc, tc);
@@ -1315,20 +1315,20 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_paging_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
struct riscv_iommu_domain *domain = iommu_domain_to_riscv(iommu_domain);
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
- u64 fsc, ta;
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
if (!riscv_iommu_pt_supported(iommu, domain->pgd_mode))
return -ENODEV;
- fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, domain->pgd_mode) |
- FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, virt_to_pfn(domain->pgd_root));
- ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
- RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
+ dc.fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, domain->pgd_mode) |
+ FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, virt_to_pfn(domain->pgd_root));
+ dc.ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
+ RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
if (riscv_iommu_bond_link(domain, dev))
return -ENOMEM;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, fsc, ta);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = domain;
@@ -1419,9 +1419,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_blocking_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
/* Make device context invalid, translation requests will fault w/ #258 */
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, 0);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
@@ -1440,8 +1443,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_identity_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
+ dc.ta = RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
--
2.47.0
More information about the kvm-riscv
mailing list