[PATCH 2/6] riscv: Add test to probe SBI Extension
Andrew Jones
ajones at ventanamicro.com
Wed Mar 13 13:02:58 PDT 2024
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 03:53:25PM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org>
>
> Factor out vendor id test to a new helper, and add a new test for
> probing the SBI extension.
> Compare the retrieved value against an environment variable, as the
> implementation can return any non-zero value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino at redhat.com>
> ---
> V3:
> - Adapt patch to use __base_sbi_ecall
>
> riscv/sbi.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index 48d0b06e..55bfcd42 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -19,29 +19,49 @@ static struct sbiret __base_sbi_ecall(int fid, unsigned long arg0)
> return sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, fid, arg0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
> -int main(int argc, char **argv)
> -
The last patch's stray blank line is removed here, so OK, but better to
not add it in the first place.
> +static void check_base(void)
> {
> struct sbiret ret;
> long expected;
>
> - if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) {
> - help();
> - exit(0);
> - }
> -
> - report_prefix_push("sbi");
> + report_prefix_push("base");
>
> if (!getenv("MVENDORID")) {
> report_skip("mvendorid: missing MVENDORID environment variable");
> - goto done;
> + return;
> }
> +
> + report_prefix_push("mvendorid");
> expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0);
>
> ret = __base_sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, 0);
> - report(!ret.error, "mvendorid: no error");
> - report(ret.value == expected, "mvendorid");
>
> -done:
> + report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
> + report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("probe_ext");
> + expected = getenv("PROBE_EXT") ? strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0) : 1;
> +
> + ret = __base_sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, 0);
The arg shouldn't be zero for this test. Before, you probed for the base
extension itself.
> +
> + report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
> + report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +
> + if (argc > 1 && !strcmp(argv[1], "-h")) {
> + help();
> + exit(0);
> + }
> +
> + report_prefix_push("sbi");
> + check_base();
> +
> return report_summary();
> }
> --
> 2.44.0
>
Thanks,
drew
More information about the kvm-riscv
mailing list