[PATCH V2 4/6] riscv: Enable gen_report() to print the wrong value in case of failure
Andrew Jones
ajones at ventanamicro.com
Wed Mar 13 04:19:00 PDT 2024
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 09:46:22AM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org>
>
> If the test fails because the expected value doesn't match, it's
> useful to know what value was actually printed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino at redhat.com>
> ---
> V2:
> - Reduce subject to fit 70 chars
> - Use report_info() to output expected vs received values,
> leaving only necessary information for parsers on report()
>
> riscv/sbi.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index 76f6111d..bc0f5c68 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,15 @@ static bool env_or_skip(const char *env)
> return true;
> }
>
> -static void gen_report(struct sbiret *ret, long expected)
> +static void gen_report(struct sbiret *ret,
> + long expected_error, long expected_value)
> {
> - report(!ret->error, "no sbi.error");
> - report(ret->value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> + if (ret->value != expected_value)
This should be
if (ret->error != expected_error || ret->value != expected_value)
> + report_info("expected (error: %ld, value: %ld), received: (error: %ld, value %ld)\n",
> + expected_error, expected_value, ret->error, ret->value);
> +
> + report(ret->error == expected_error, "expected sbi.error");
> + report(ret->value == expected_value, "expected sbi.value");
nit: We can reduce some code clutter with
bool check_error = ret->error == expected_error;
bool check_value = ret->value == expected_value;
if (!check_error || !check_value)
report_info(...);
report(check_error, ...);
report(check_value, ...);
> }
>
> static void check_base(void)
> @@ -42,14 +47,14 @@ static void check_base(void)
> if (env_or_skip("MVENDORID")) {
> expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0);
> ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> - gen_report(&ret, expected);
> + gen_report(&ret, 0, expected);
> }
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> report_prefix_push("probe_ext");
> expected = getenv("PROBE_EXT") ? strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0) : 1;
> ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> - gen_report(&ret, expected);
> + gen_report(&ret, 0, expected);
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> report_prefix_push("marchid");
> @@ -57,7 +62,7 @@ static void check_base(void)
> expected = strtol(getenv("MARCHID"), NULL, 0);
> ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT,
> SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MARCHID, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> - gen_report(&ret, expected);
> + gen_report(&ret, 0, expected);
> }
> report_prefix_pop();
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
Thanks,
drew
More information about the kvm-riscv
mailing list