[PATCH 2/6] riscv: Factor out environment variable check

Andrew Jones ajones at ventanamicro.com
Fri Mar 1 00:28:58 PST 2024


On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 01:42:08PM +0100, cem at kernel.org wrote:
> From: Carlos Maiolino <cem at kernel.org>
> 
> Environment variables are checked all the time, so use a helper for that
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino at redhat.com>
> ---
>  riscv/sbi.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index 9dc82ecb..636f907a 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,23 @@ static void help(void)
>  	puts("An environ must be provided where expected values are given.\n");
>  }
>  
> +static bool env_is_defined(const char *env)

The function name doesn't imply anything about the report_skip side
effect, which is actually the important part of the function. Maybe
name it something like env_or_skip()?

> +{
> +
> +	if (!getenv(env)) {
> +		report_skip("missing %s environment variable", env);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void gen_report(struct sbiret *ret, long expected)
> +{
> +	report(!ret->error, "no sbi.error");
> +	report(ret->value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> +}

This refactoring isn't called out in the commit message.

> +
>  static void check_base(void)
>  {
>  	struct sbiret ret;
> @@ -21,34 +38,26 @@ static void check_base(void)
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("base");
>  
> -	if (!getenv("MVENDORID")) {
> -		report_skip("mvendorid: missing MVENDORID environment variable");
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
>  	report_prefix_push("mvendorid");
> -	expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0);
> +	if (env_is_defined("MVENDORID")) {
> +		expected = strtol(getenv("MVENDORID"), NULL, 0);
>  
> -	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID,
> -			0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_GET_MVENDORID,
> +				0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>  
> -	report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
> -	report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> -	report_prefix_pop();
> -
> -	if (!getenv("PROBE_EXT")) {
> -		report_skip("probe_ext: missing PROBE_EXT environment variable");
> -		return;
> +		gen_report(&ret, expected);
>  	}
> +	report_prefix_pop();
>  
>  	report_prefix_push("probe_ext");
> -	expected = strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0);
> +	if (env_is_defined("PROBE_EXT")) {
> +		expected = strtol(getenv("PROBE_EXT"), NULL, 0);
>  
> -	ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT,
> -			SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +		ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT,
> +				SBI_EXT_BASE, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
>  
> -	report(!ret.error, "no sbi.error");
> -	report(ret.value == expected, "expected sbi.value");
> +		gen_report(&ret, expected);
> +	}
>  	report_prefix_pop();
>  
>  	report_prefix_pop();
> -- 
> 2.43.2
>

Thanks,
drew



More information about the kvm-riscv mailing list