[PATCH kvm-unit-tests v2] riscv: sbi: debug console write tests
Andrew Jones
andrew.jones at linux.dev
Mon Jul 15 15:33:29 PDT 2024
On Sat, Jul 06, 2024 at 04:55:46PM GMT, Cade Richard wrote:
>
Needs commit message
>
> ---
Need to remove the above ---
> Signed-off-by: Cade Richard <cade.richard at berkeley.edu>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Added prefix pop to exit dbcn tests
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240706-sbi-dbcn-write-tests-v1-1-b754e51699f8@berkeley.edu
> ---
> lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h | 7 +++++++
> riscv/sbi.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h b/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
> index d82a384d..c5fa84ae 100644
> --- a/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
> +++ b/lib/riscv/asm/sbi.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ enum sbi_ext_id {
> SBI_EXT_BASE = 0x10,
> SBI_EXT_HSM = 0x48534d,
> SBI_EXT_SRST = 0x53525354,
> + SBI_EXT_DBCN = 0x4442434E,
> };
>
> enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
> @@ -37,6 +38,12 @@ enum sbi_ext_hsm_fid {
> SBI_EXT_HSM_HART_SUSPEND,
> };
>
> +enum sbi_ext_dbcn_fid {
> + SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE = 0,
> + SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_READ,
> + SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE_BYTE,
> +};
> +
> struct sbiret {
> long error;
> long value;
> diff --git a/riscv/sbi.c b/riscv/sbi.c
> index 762e9711..18646842 100644
> --- a/riscv/sbi.c
> +++ b/riscv/sbi.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,10 @@
> #include <libcflat.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <asm/sbi.h>
> +#include <asm/io.h>
> +
> +#define DBCN_WRITE_TEST_STRING "DBCN_WRITE_TEST_STRING\n"
> +#define DBCN_WRITE_BYTE_TEST_BYTE (u8)'a'
>
> static void help(void)
> {
> @@ -19,6 +23,11 @@ static struct sbiret __base_sbi_ecall(int fid, unsigned long arg0)
> return sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, fid, arg0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> }
>
> +static struct sbiret __dbcn_sbi_ecall(int fid, unsigned long arg0, unsigned long arg1, unsigned long arg2)
> +{
> + return sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBCN, fid, arg0, arg1, arg2, 0, 0, 0);
> +}
> +
> static bool env_or_skip(const char *env)
> {
> if (!getenv(env)) {
> @@ -112,6 +121,56 @@ static void check_base(void)
> report_prefix_pop();
> }
>
> +static void check_dbcn(void)
> +{
> +
Stray blank line here
> + struct sbiret ret;
> + unsigned long num_bytes, base_addr_lo, base_addr_hi;
> +
> + report_prefix_push("dbcn");
> +
> + ret = __base_sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, SBI_EXT_DBCN);
> + if (!ret.value) {
> + report_skip("DBCN extension unavailable");
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + return;
> + }
We should provide a
long sbi_probe(int ext)
{
struct sbiret ret;
ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, ext, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
assert(!ret.error);
return ret.value;
}
in lib/riscv/sbi.c and use that everywhere we need to do checks like
these.
> +
> + report_prefix_push("write");
> +
> + num_bytes = strlen(DBCN_WRITE_TEST_STRING);
> + base_addr_hi = 0x0;
We shouldn't assume that the high part of the address is zero. We
can set it to whatever the high part of virt_to_phys(...) is.
> + base_addr_lo = virt_to_phys((void *) &DBCN_WRITE_TEST_STRING);
^ remove this space
> +
> + do {
> + ret = __dbcn_sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE, num_bytes, base_addr_lo, base_addr_hi);
> + num_bytes -= ret.value;
> + base_addr_lo += ret.value;
> + } while (num_bytes != 0 && ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS) ;
^ remove this
space
add a blank line here
> + report(SBI_SUCCESS == ret.error, "write success");
nit: write this as 'ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS'
> + report(ret.value == num_bytes, "correct number of bytes written");
ret.value may not be num_bytes since we may have issued more than one
SBI call and ret.value is only whatever the last call wrote. This check
isn't actually necessary since we have the SBI_SUCCESS check already
and we can't get SBI_SUCCESS without num_bytes == 0. It may be interesting
to know how many SBI calls were made (for successful writes and failed
writes). We could add a counter to the loop and then a report_info here.
> +
> + // Bytes are read from memory and written to the console
Use /* */ as described in the kernel's coding style documentation.
> + if (env_or_skip("INVALID_READ_ADDR")) {
> + base_addr_lo = strtol(getenv("INVALID_READ_ADDR"), NULL, 0);
> + ret = __dbcn_sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE, num_bytes, base_addr_lo, base_addr_hi);
num_bytes is likely zero right now so it may not matter what the address
is. The user specified address doesn't have to be 32-bit only so it should
also set hi.
> + report(ret.error == SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM, "invalid parameter: address");
> + };
^ unnecessary ;
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> +
> + report_prefix_push("write_byte");
> +
> + puts("DBCN_WRITE TEST CHAR: ");
> + ret = __dbcn_sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_DBCN_CONSOLE_WRITE_BYTE, (u8)DBCN_WRITE_BYTE_TEST_BYTE, 0, 0);
^ this
cast isn't necessary
> + puts("\n");
> + report(ret.error == SBI_SUCCESS, "write success");
> + report(ret.value == 0, "expected ret.value");
> +
> + report_prefix_pop();
> + report_prefix_pop();
We should add a comment somewhere pointing out that there's also a read
function, but there's no easy way to test that. If we're optimistic that
we'll eventually come up with a way, then the comment can contain a TODO
tag.
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
>
> @@ -122,6 +181,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> report_prefix_push("sbi");
> check_base();
> + check_dbcn();
>
> return report_summary();
> }
>
> ---
> base-commit: 40e1fd76ffc80b1d43214e31a023aaf087ece987
> change-id: 20240706-sbi-dbcn-write-tests-42289f1391ed
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Cade Richard <cade.richard at berkeley.edu>
>
Thanks,
drew
More information about the kvm-riscv
mailing list