[PATCH v2 8/8] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add sstc timer test

Haibo Xu xiaobo55x at gmail.com
Wed Sep 6 21:20:29 PDT 2023


On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:58 PM Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:59:30PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > Add a KVM selftest to validate the Sstc timer functionality.
> > The test was ported from arm64 arch timer test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu at intel.com>
> > ---

> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..c50a33c1e4f9
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > +/*
> > + * arch_timer.c - Tests the riscv64 sstc timer IRQ functionality
> > + *
> > + * The test validates the sstc timer IRQs using vstimecmp registers.
> > + * It's ported from the aarch64 arch_timer test.
> > + *

> guest_run[_stage]() can be shared with aarch64, we just have a single
> stage=0 for riscv.
>

Yes, we can. But if we share the guest_run[_stage]() by moving it to
kvm/arch_timer.c
or kvm/include/timer_test.h, we need to declare extra sub-functions
somewhere in a
header file(etc. guest_configure_timer_action()).

> > +
> > +static void guest_code(void)
> > +{
> > +     uint32_t cpu = guest_get_vcpuid();
> > +     struct test_vcpu_shared_data *shared_data = &vcpu_shared_data[cpu];
> > +
> > +     local_irq_disable();
> > +     timer_irq_disable();
> > +     local_irq_enable();
>
> I don't think we need to disable all interrupts when disabling the timer
> interrupt.
>

There is no local_irq_disable() protection during the initial debug
phase, but the test always
fail with below error messages:

Guest assert failed,  vcpu 0; stage; 0; iter: 0
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
  riscv/arch_timer.c:78: config_iter + 1 == irq_iter
  pid=585 tid=586 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
  (stack trace empty)
  0x1 != 0x0 (config_iter + 1 != irq_iter)

To be frank, I am not quite sure why the local_irq_disable/enable() matters.
One possible reason may be some timer irq was triggered before we set up the
timecmp register.

> > +
> > +     guest_run(shared_data);
> > +
> > +     GUEST_DONE();
> > +}
> > +
> > +void test_vm_cleanup(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> > +{
> > +     kvm_vm_free(vm);
> > +}
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Thanks,
> drew



More information about the kvm-riscv mailing list