[PATCH v2 11/13] RISC-V: KVM: selftests: Add guest_sbi_probe_extension
Anup Patel
anup at brainfault.org
Fri Dec 15 01:21:53 PST 2023
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 3:46 PM Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Add guest_sbi_probe_extension(), allowing guest code to probe for
> SBI extensions. As guest_sbi_probe_extension() needs
> SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED, take the opportunity to bring in all SBI
> error codes. We don't bring in all current extension IDs or base
> extension function IDs though, even though we need one of each,
> because we'd prefer to bring those in as necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
Regards,
Anup
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
> index e70ccda2011b..dc50ad62e150 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,17 @@ static inline uint64_t __kvm_reg_id(uint64_t type, uint64_t subtype,
> #define SATP_ASID_SHIFT 44
> #define SATP_ASID_MASK _AC(0xFFFF, UL)
>
> +/* SBI return error codes */
> +#define SBI_SUCCESS 0
> +#define SBI_ERR_FAILURE -1
> +#define SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED -2
> +#define SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM -3
> +#define SBI_ERR_DENIED -4
> +#define SBI_ERR_INVALID_ADDRESS -5
> +#define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_AVAILABLE -6
> +#define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STARTED -7
> +#define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_STOPPED -8
> +
> #define SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START 0x08000000
> #define SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END 0x08FFFFFF
>
> @@ -115,6 +126,14 @@ static inline uint64_t __kvm_reg_id(uint64_t type, uint64_t subtype,
> #define KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_UCALL 0
> #define KVM_RISCV_SELFTESTS_SBI_UNEXP 1
>
> +enum sbi_ext_id {
> + SBI_EXT_BASE = 0x10,
> +};
> +
> +enum sbi_ext_base_fid {
> + SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT = 3,
> +};
> +
> struct sbiret {
> long error;
> long value;
> @@ -125,4 +144,6 @@ struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0,
> unsigned long arg3, unsigned long arg4,
> unsigned long arg5);
>
> +bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val);
> +
> #endif /* SELFTEST_KVM_PROCESSOR_H */
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
> index 6905a4348380..7ca736fb4194 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
> @@ -393,3 +393,22 @@ struct sbiret sbi_ecall(int ext, int fid, unsigned long arg0,
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +bool guest_sbi_probe_extension(int extid, long *out_val)
> +{
> + struct sbiret ret;
> +
> + ret = sbi_ecall(SBI_EXT_BASE, SBI_EXT_BASE_PROBE_EXT, extid,
> + 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> +
> + __GUEST_ASSERT(!ret.error || ret.error == SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> + "ret.error=%ld, ret.value=%ld\n", ret.error, ret.value);
> +
> + if (ret.error == SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (out_val)
> + *out_val = ret.value;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> --
> 2.43.0
>
More information about the kvm-riscv
mailing list