[PATCH v4 08/15] KVM: arm64: Return a value from check_vcpu_requests()

[Oliver Upton]

A subsequent change to KVM will introduce a vCPU request that could
result in an exit to userspace. Change check_vcpu_requests() to return a
value and document the function. Unconditionally return 1 for now.

Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton at google.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 7c297ddc8177..8eed0556ccaa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -648,7 +648,16 @@ void kvm_vcpu_wfi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
-static void check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+/**
+ * check_vcpu_requests - check and handle pending vCPU requests
+ * @vcpu:	the VCPU pointer
+ *
+ * Return: 1 if we should enter the guest
+ *	   0 if we should exit to userspace
+ *	   <= 0 if we should exit to userspace, where the return value indicates
+ *	   an error
+ */
+static int check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	if (kvm_request_pending(vcpu)) {
 		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SLEEP, vcpu))
@@ -678,6 +687,8 @@ static void check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 			kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(vcpu,
 					    __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0));
 	}
+
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static bool vcpu_mode_is_bad_32bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -793,7 +804,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		if (!ret)
 			ret = 1;
 
-		check_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
+		if (ret > 0)
+			ret = check_vcpu_requests(vcpu);
 
 		/*
 		 * Preparing the interrupts to be injected also
-- 
2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog