[PATCH v5 1/5] RISC-V: KVM: Mark the existing SBI implementation as v01
heiko at sntech.de
Tue Jan 4 05:27:14 PST 2022
Am Dienstag, 4. Januar 2022, 14:19:41 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Hi Atish,
> Am Donnerstag, 18. November 2021, 09:39:08 CET schrieb Atish Patra:
> > From: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>
> > The existing SBI specification impelementation follows v0.1
> > specification. The latest specification allows more
> > scalability and performance improvements.
> > Rename the existing implementation as v01 and provide a way to allow
> > future extensions.
> > Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel at wdc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp at rivosinc.com>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> > index eb3c045edf11..32376906ff20 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > -/**
> > +/*
> > * Copyright (c) 2019 Western Digital Corporation or its affiliates.
> > *
> > * Authors:
> This got already fixed by 
> commit 0e2e64192100 ("riscv: kvm: fix non-kernel-doc comment block")
> so this patch doesn't apply cleanly anymore.
hmm, just found Anup's "I've queued this..." message after
writing my reply, so scratch the above ;-) .
@Anup: I've looked at git.kernel.org but didn't find a tree
there, can you tell me where this did go to?
More information about the kvm-riscv