[PATCH 1/5] KVM: arm64: Cap KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS by KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS

Paolo Bonzini pbonzini at redhat.com
Tue Nov 16 07:50:23 PST 2021


On 11/16/21 14:23, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> (I'm about to send v2 as we have s390 sorted out.)
> 
> So what do we decide about ARM?
> - Current approach (kvm->arch.max_vcpus/kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus()
>   depending on 'if (kvm)') - that would be my preference.

That would be mine too.

Paolo

> - Always kvm_arm_default_max_vcpus to make the output independent on 'if
>   (kvm)'.
> - keep the status quo (drop the patch).




More information about the kvm-riscv mailing list