[PATCH v1 05/12] target/riscv: Implement kvm_arch_put_registers

[Anup Patel]

On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 1:17 PM Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Put GPR CSR and FP registers to kvm by KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctl
>
> Signed-off-by: Yifei Jiang <jiangyifei at huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mingwang Li <limingwang at huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com>
> ---
>  target/riscv/kvm.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/kvm.c b/target/riscv/kvm.c
> index b49c24be0a..5fe5ca4434 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/kvm.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,31 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
>      return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> +    int ret = 0;
> +    int i;
> +    target_ulong reg;
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> +    reg = env->pc;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CORE_REG(env, regs.pc), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    for (i = 1; i < 32; i++) {
> +        uint64_t id = kvm_riscv_reg_id(env, KVM_REG_RISCV_CORE, i);
> +        reg = env->gpr[i];
> +        ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, id, &reg);
> +        if (ret) {
> +            return ret;
> +        }
> +    }
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
>  {
>      int ret = 0;
> @@ -153,6 +178,69 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
>      return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> +    int ret = 0;
> +    target_ulong reg;
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> +    reg = env->mstatus;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sstatus), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->mie;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sie), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->stvec;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, stvec), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->sscratch;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sscratch), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->sepc;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sepc), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->scause;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, scause), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->stval;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, stval), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->mip;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, sip), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    reg = env->satp;
> +    ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_CSR_REG(env, satp), &reg);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }

Same as the previous patch, there is a common pattern in above
kvm_set_one_reg() calls. Please use a macro to simplify.

Regards,
Anup

> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
>  {
>      int ret = 0;
> @@ -186,6 +274,40 @@ static int kvm_riscv_get_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
>      return ret;
>  }
>
> +static int kvm_riscv_put_regs_fp(CPUState *cs)
> +{
> +    int ret = 0;
> +    int i;
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(cs)->env;
> +
> +    if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVD)) {
> +        uint64_t reg;
> +        for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> +            reg = env->fpr[i];
> +            ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_FP_D_REG(env, i), &reg);
> +            if (ret) {
> +                return ret;
> +            }
> +        }
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    if (riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
> +        uint32_t reg;
> +        for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> +            reg = env->fpr[i];
> +            ret = kvm_set_one_reg(cs, RISCV_FP_F_REG(env, i), &reg);
> +            if (ret) {
> +                return ret;
> +            }
> +        }
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
>  const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = {
>      KVM_CAP_LAST_INFO
>  };
> @@ -214,7 +336,24 @@ int kvm_arch_get_registers(CPUState *cs)
>
>  int kvm_arch_put_registers(CPUState *cs, int level)
>  {
> -    return 0;
> +    int ret = 0;
> +
> +    ret = kvm_riscv_put_regs_core(cs);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    ret = kvm_riscv_put_regs_csr(cs);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    ret = kvm_riscv_put_regs_fp(cs);
> +    if (ret) {
> +        return ret;
> +    }
> +
> +    return ret;
>  }
>
>  int kvm_arch_release_virq_post(int virq)
> --
> 2.19.1
>
>
> --
> kvm-riscv mailing list
> kvm-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv