[PATCH v5 17/17] mm/page-flags: remove PG_private

[Zi Yan]

On 20 Sep 2026, at 22:55, sashiko-bot at kernel.org wrote:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] mm: silent memory leak masking due to PG_private removal
> --
>
> commit aee12ed3446e69cb6eee57384ca09e768dab36dd
> Author: Zi Yan <ziy at nvidia.com>
>
> mm/page-flags: remove PG_private
>
> This commit removes the PG_private page flag and replaces its usage with
> checking if folio->private != NULL. The space left by PG_private is
> reserved as PG_folio for future use.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> index 7080a6a1a79e7..b0ddc652e76cc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> [ ... ]
>> @@ -1169,7 +1175,7 @@ static __always_inline void __ClearPageAnonExclusive(struct page *page)
>>   */
>>  #define PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE				\
>>  	(1UL << PG_lru		| 1UL << PG_locked	|	\
>> -	 1UL << PG_private	| 1UL << PG_private_2	|	\
>> +	 1UL << PG_private_2	|				\
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Since PG_private is removed from PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE, does this bypass
> the safety check that ensures a page doesn't have uncleared private data?
>
> Looking at __free_pages_prepare() in mm/page_alloc.c:
>
> 	page_cpupid_reset_last(page);
> 	page->flags.f &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> 	page->private = 0;
> 	reset_page_owner(page, order);
>
> The head page's private field is silently zeroed here without any prior
> verification that it was NULL. Previously, free_page_is_bad() would catch
> and report leaked data via a bad_page() warning using
> PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE.
>
> Now, if a buggy filesystem fails to detach and free folio->private data
> before freeing the page, will this result in silent memory leaks?

Answer copied from RFC:

After the conversion, folio/page should have an elevated refcount whenever
->private is set. That would help detect leaked private data. I tried to
enforce ->private needs to be NULL at page free time[1], but that might
cause trouble for certain use cases.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260223032641.1859381-1-ziy@nvidia.com/


>
>>  	 1UL << PG_writeback	| 1UL << PG_reserved	|	\
>>  	 1UL << PG_active 	|				\
>>  	 1UL << PG_unevictable	| __PG_MLOCKED | LRU_GEN_MASK)
>
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260920-remove-pg_private-v5-0-bb68b6a21869@nvidia.com?part=17


Best Regards,
Yan, Zi