[PATCH v4 2/9] crash_dump: Disallow writing to dm-crypt configfs during kexec_file_load syscall
Sourabh Jain
sourabhjain at linux.ibm.com
Sat Aug 29 00:02:46 PDT 2026
On 28/08/26 14:18, Coiby Xu wrote:
> If writing to the configfs group happens concurrently during
> kexec_file_load syscall, it may lead to the following issues,
> - buffer overflow if dm-crypt keys are added after allocation
> - stale total_keys if dm-crypt keys are removed during iteration
> - keys_header will not be freed if config/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse is
> set true
>
> So hold config_keys_subsys.su_mutex for the entire sequence during the
> kexec_file_load syscall to ensure a consistent snapshot. To have serial
> access to config/crash_dm_crypt_key/reuse, use the kexec lock as we also
> need to access kexec_crash_image serially.
>
> Fixes: 479e58549b0f ("crash_dump: store dm crypt keys in kdump reserved memory")
> Suggested-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain at linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu at gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c b/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> index 4335b6cb1fc4..026c7de4ad85 100644
> --- a/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_dump_dm_crypt.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/configfs.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> +#include "kexec_internal.h"
>
> #define KEY_NUM_MAX 128 /* maximum dm crypt keys */
> #define KEY_SIZE_MAX 256 /* maximum dm crypt key size */
> @@ -296,14 +297,20 @@ static ssize_t config_keys_reuse_store(struct config_item *item,
> bool val;
> int r;
>
> + if (!kexec_trylock()) {
> + r = -EBUSY;
> + goto unlock;
Are we unlocking a lock that we didn't acquire? How about returning
-EBUSY directly instead?
> + }
> +
> + r = -EINVAL;
> if (!kexec_crash_image || !kexec_crash_image->dm_crypt_keys_addr) {
> kexec_dprintk(
> "dm-crypt keys haven't be saved to crash-reserved memory\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> }
>
> if (kstrtobool(page, &val) || !val)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
>
> if (is_dm_key_reused) {
> pr_info("Already got dm-crypt keys, please continue with kexec_file_load syscall\n");
> @@ -311,12 +318,15 @@ static ssize_t config_keys_reuse_store(struct config_item *item,
> r = get_keys_from_kdump_reserved_memory();
> if (r) {
> pr_warn("Failed to get dm-crypt keys from reserved memory\n");
> - return r;
> + goto unlock;
> }
> is_dm_key_reused = true;
[...]
> }
>
> - return count;
> + r = count;
> +unlock:
> + kexec_unlock();
> + return r;
> }
>
> CONFIGFS_ATTR(config_keys_, reuse);
> @@ -421,6 +431,8 @@ static int build_keys_header(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static bool mutex_acquired;
> +
> int crash_load_dm_crypt_keys(struct kimage *image)
> {
> struct kexec_buf kbuf = {
> @@ -432,6 +444,9 @@ int crash_load_dm_crypt_keys(struct kimage *image)
> };
> int r = 0;
>
> + mutex_lock(&config_keys_subsys.su_mutex);
> + mutex_acquired = true;
> +
> if (key_count <= 0) {
> kexec_dprintk("No dm-crypt keys\n");
> return 0;
> @@ -481,6 +496,11 @@ void kexec_file_post_load_cleanup_dm_crypt(struct kimage *image)
I explored the kexec_file_load syscall entry path and noticed
that there is a path where the call to
kimage_file_post_load_cleanup() can be skipped.
For example, if kexec_file_load is called and everything goes well
but kexec_post_load() fails, we skip
kimage_file_post_load_cleanup(), and consequently
kexec_file_post_load_cleanup_dm_crypt() as well.
If that happens, the config_keys_subsys.su_mutex remains locked,
which could cause problems with the next kexec load, right?
- Sourabh Jain
> kfree_sensitive(keys_header);
> keys_header = NULL;
> }
> +
> + if (mutex_acquired) {
> + mutex_unlock(&config_keys_subsys.su_mutex);
> + mutex_acquired = false;
> + }
> }
>
> static int __init configfs_dmcrypt_keys_init(void)
More information about the kexec
mailing list