[PATCH] kho: free chunks using free_page() instead of kfree()

[Pratyush Yadav]

On Wed, Nov 19 2025, Markus Elfring wrote:

> …
>> When the commit switched to using the buddy allocator directly, it
>> missed updating kho_mem_ser_free() to use free_page() instead of
>> kfree().
>
> Would another imperative wording become helpful for an improved change description?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.18-rc6#n94

"the commit" here refers to the commit fa759cd75bce5 ("kho: allocate
metadata directly from the buddy allocator"), not "this commit"/"this
patch". I figured that can be understood from the context and I won't
need to spell the whole thing out again.

I don't understand the technicalities of the English grammar so well,
but IIUC imperative mood is used in sentences that give a command. This
paragraph talks about a past event.

Anyway, if you have something better, happy to take suggestions.

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav