[PATCH v10 1/8] ima: rename variable the ser_file "file" to "ima_kexec_file"

[steven chen]

On 3/18/2025 7:43 PM, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 03/18/25 at 11:10am, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>
>> On 3/17/25 9:04 PM, steven chen wrote:
>>> The name of the local variable "file" of type seq_file defined in the
>>> ima_dump_measurement_list function is too generic. To better reflect the
>>> purpose of the variable, rename it to "ima_kexec_file". This change will
>>> help improve code readability and maintainability by making the variable's
>>> role more explicit.
>>>
>>> The variable ima_kexec_file is indeed the memory allocated for copying IMA
>>> measurement records. The ima_dump_measurement_list function calculates the
>>> actual memory occupied by the IMA logs and compares it with the allocated
>>> memory. If there is enough memory, it copies all IMA measurement records;
>>> otherwise, it does not copy any records, which would result in a failure
>>> of remote attestation.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: steven chen <chenste at linux.microsoft.com>
>>
>>> ---
>>>    security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>>>    1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>>> index 9d45f4d26f73..8567619889d1 100644
>>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c
>>> @@ -15,33 +15,41 @@
>>>    #include "ima.h"
>>>    #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_KEXEC
>>> +/*
>>> + * Copy the measurement list to the allocated memory
>>> + * compare the size of IMA measurement list with the size of the allocated memory
>> Compare the size of the IMA ... memory.
>>
>>
>>> + *    if the size of the allocated memory is not less than the size of IMA measurement list
>>> + *        copy the measurement list to the allocated memory.
>>> + *    else
>>> + *        return error
>> If the size of the allocated memory is not less than the size of IMA
>> measurement list, copy the measurement list to the allocated memory, return
>> an error otherwise.
> Ack the suggested change.

Thanks for the comments.