[PATCH v1 1/2] kexec_core: Fix error code path in the KEXEC_JUMP flow

Rafael J. Wysocki rafael at kernel.org
Fri Jul 11 02:29:03 PDT 2025


On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 8:16 AM Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 07/10/25 at 03:10pm, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> >
> > If dpm_suspend_start() fails, dpm_resume_end() must be called to
> > recover devices whose suspend callbacks have been called, but this
> > does not happen in the KEXEC_JUMP flow's error path due to a confused
> > goto target label.
> >
> > Address this by using the correct target label in the goto statement in
> > question.
>
> Sounds very reasonable, thanks for the fix.
>
> Acked-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>

Thanks!

I've queued it up for 6.17 along with the [2/2].

> >
> > Fixes: 2965faa5e03d ("kexec: split kexec_load syscall from kexec core code")
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/kexec_core.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > --- a/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kexec_core.c
> > @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@
> >               console_suspend_all();
> >               error = dpm_suspend_start(PMSG_FREEZE);
> >               if (error)
> > -                     goto Resume_console;
> > +                     goto Resume_devices;
> >               /*
> >                * dpm_suspend_end() must be called after dpm_suspend_start()
> >                * to complete the transition, like in the hibernation flows
> >
> >
> >
>



More information about the kexec mailing list