[PATCH 3/3] s390/Kconfig: drop select of KEXEC
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev at linux.ibm.com
Thu Nov 23 05:43:00 PST 2023
On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 03:36:52PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
Hi Baoquan,
> No proof is found to require that S390 architecture has to select
> KEXEC. At least from my testing at below, dropping select of KEXEC won't
> impact anything.
It does impact the outcome of defconfigs.
Namely, CONFIG_KEXEC is not set with this patch.
> ===testing 1===
> CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
> CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
> ===
>
> ===testing 2===
> CONFIG_CRASH_CORE=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE=y
> CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE=y
> CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP=y
> ===
Unfortunately, I do not quite realize what these testings were
and what is the difference between the two.
> So drop the select of KEXEC now.
I suggest dropping this patch. Once the previous two are upstream
we would remove 'select KEXEC' from Kconfig together with defconfig
updates.
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/Kconfig b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> index 3bec98d20283..1aec2e692dca 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
> @@ -217,7 +217,6 @@ config S390
> select HAVE_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_IDLE
> select IOMMU_HELPER if PCI
> select IOMMU_SUPPORT if PCI
> - select KEXEC
> select MMU_GATHER_MERGE_VMAS
> select MMU_GATHER_NO_GATHER
> select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> --
Thanks!
More information about the kexec
mailing list