[PATCH v3] kexec: Support purgatories with .text.hot sections

Philipp Rudo prudo at redhat.com
Fri Mar 24 08:58:55 PDT 2023


Hi Ricardo,

On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 20:09:21 +0100
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda at chromium.org> wrote:

> Clang16 links the purgatory text in two sections:
> 
>   [ 1] .text             PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00000040
>        00000000000011a1  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     16
>   [ 2] .rela.text        RELA             0000000000000000  00003498
>        0000000000000648  0000000000000018   I      24     1     8
>   ...
>   [17] .text.hot.        PROGBITS         0000000000000000  00003220
>        000000000000020b  0000000000000000  AX       0     0     1
>   [18] .rela.text.hot.   RELA             0000000000000000  00004428
>        0000000000000078  0000000000000018   I      24    17     8
> 
> And both of them have their range [sh_addr ... sh_addr+sh_size] on the
> area pointed by `e_entry`.
> 
> This causes that image->start is calculated twice, once for .text and
> another time for .text.hot. The second calculation leaves image->start
> in a random location.
> 
> Because of this, the system crashes inmediatly after:
> 
> kexec_core: Starting new kernel

Great analysis!

> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda at chromium.org>
> ---
> kexec: Fix kexec_file_load for llvm16
> 
> When upreving llvm I realised that kexec stopped working on my test
> platform. This patch fixes it.
> 
> To: Eric Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com>
> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> Cc: Philipp Rudo <prudo at redhat.com>
> Cc: kexec at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix initial value. Thanks Ross!
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321-kexec_clang16-v2-0-d10e5d517869@chromium.org
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix if condition. Thanks Steven!.
> - Update Philipp email. Thanks Baoquan.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321-kexec_clang16-v1-0-a768fc2c7c4d@chromium.org
> ---
>  kernel/kexec_file.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index f1a0e4e3fb5c..25a37d8f113a 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -901,10 +901,21 @@ static int kexec_purgatory_setup_sechdrs(struct purgatory_info *pi,
>  		}
>  
>  		offset = ALIGN(offset, align);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Check if the segment contains the entry point, if so,
> +		 * calculate the value of image->start based on it.
> +		 * If the compiler has produced more than one .text sections
> +		 * (Eg: .text.hot), they are generally after the main .text
> +		 * section, and they shall not be used to calculate
> +		 * image->start. So do not re-calculate image->start if it
> +		 * is not set to the initial value.
> +		 */
>  		if (sechdrs[i].sh_flags & SHF_EXECINSTR &&
>  		    pi->ehdr->e_entry >= sechdrs[i].sh_addr &&
>  		    pi->ehdr->e_entry < (sechdrs[i].sh_addr
> -					 + sechdrs[i].sh_size)) {
> +					 + sechdrs[i].sh_size) &&
> +		    kbuf->image->start == pi->ehdr->e_entry) {

I'm not entirely sure if this is the solution to go with. As you state
in the comment above this solution assumes that the .text section comes
before any other .text.* section. But this assumption isn't much
stronger than the assumption that there is only a single .text section,
which is used nowadays.

The best solution I can come up with right now is to introduce a linker
script for the purgatory that simply merges the .text sections into
one. Similar to what I did for s390 in
arch/s390/purgatory/purgatory.lds.S (although for a different reason).
But that would require every architecture to get one. An alternative
would be to find a way to get rid of the -r option on the LD_FLAGS,
which IIRC is the reason why both section overlap in the first place.

Thanks
Philipp

>  			kbuf->image->start -= sechdrs[i].sh_addr;
>  			kbuf->image->start += kbuf->mem + offset;
>  		}
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 17214b70a159c6547df9ae204a6275d983146f6b
> change-id: 20230321-kexec_clang16-4510c23d129c
> 
> Best regards,




More information about the kexec mailing list