[PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues
Baoquan He
bhe at redhat.com
Mon Jul 10 23:59:35 PDT 2023
On 07/11/23 at 11:53am, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:35:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/10/23 at 05:14pm, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > > > still returns all CPUs.
> > > >
> > > > That's simply broken. Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > > > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
> > >
> > > That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> > >
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> > > simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
> >
> > I don't know maxcpus on arm and ppc64 well. But maxcpus=1 or nr_cpus=1
> > are suggested parameter. Because usually nr_cpus=1 is enough to make
> > kdump kernel work well to capture vmcore. However, user is allowed to
> > specify nr_cpus=n (n>1) if they think multiple cpus are needed in kdump
> > kernel. Your hard coding of cpu number in kdump kernel may be not so
> > reasonable.
>
> As I mentioned, for arm/ppc64, passing 'maxcpus=1' actually follows
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
>
> 'nr_cpus=N' just works fine, so not related with this topic.
>
> After 'maxcpus=1' is passed, kernel only brings up one of cpu cores as
> online during booting, and others still can be put into online by
> userspace. Now this way causes IO timeout on some storage device which
> uses managed irq and supports multiple io queues.
>
> Here the focus is if passing 'maxcpus=1' is valid for kdump
> kernel, that is we want to hear from our arch/kdump guys.
Yes, 'maxcpus=1' is valid and suggested on ppc64 for kdump kernel
if needed, because there's no 'nr_cpus=' support on ppc64 yet.
>
> If yes, something needs to be fixed, such as, what this patchset is
> doing.
>
> >
> > Please cc kexec mailing list when posting so that people can view the
> > whole thread of discussion.
>
> Already Cc kexe & arm/powerpc & irq list.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ming
>
More information about the kexec
mailing list