[PATCH v18 5/7] kexec: exclude hot remove cpu from elfcorehdr notes

Thomas Gleixner tglx at linutronix.de
Wed Feb 1 03:33:17 PST 2023


Eric!

On Tue, Jan 31 2023 at 17:42, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> --- a/kernel/crash_core.c
> +++ b/kernel/crash_core.c
> @@ -366,6 +366,14 @@ int crash_prepare_elf64_headers(struct kimage *image, struct crash_mem *mem,
>  
>  	/* Prepare one phdr of type PT_NOTE for each present CPU */
>  	for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU)) {
> +			/* Skip the soon-to-be offlined cpu */
> +			if ((image->hp_action == KEXEC_CRASH_HP_REMOVE_CPU) &&
> +				(cpu == image->offlinecpu))
> +				continue;
> +		}
> +#endif

I'm failing to see how the above is correct in any way. Look at the
following sequence of events:

     1) Offline CPU$N

        -> Prepare elf headers with CPU$N excluded

     2) Another hotplug operation != 'Online CPU$N'

        -> Prepare elf headers with CPU$N included

Also in case of loading the crash kernel in the situation where not all
present CPUs are online (think boot time SMT disable) then your
resulting crash image will contain all present CPUs and none of the
offline CPUs are excluded.

How does that make any sense at all?

This image->hp_action and image->offlinecpu dance is engineering
voodoo. You just can do:

        for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
            if (!cpu_online(cpu))
            	continue;
            do_stuff(cpu);

which does the right thing in all situations and can be further
simplified to:

        for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
            do_stuff(cpu);

without the need for ifdefs or whatever.

No?

Thanks,

        tglx



More information about the kexec mailing list