[PATCH] arm64: fix static data relocations in machine_apply_elf_rel()

[Pingfan Liu]

As for 'static data relocations', instead of patching an instruction (OR
ops), it should be assigned to value directly.

Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <piliu at redhat.com>
Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff at infradead.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
To: kexec at lists.infradead.org
---
 kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c
index 311731d..ec6df4b 100644
--- a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c
+++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-arm64.c
@@ -1249,13 +1249,12 @@ void machine_apply_elf_rel(struct mem_ehdr *ehdr, struct mem_sym *UNUSED(sym),
 	case R_AARCH64_ABS64:
 		type = "ABS64";
 		loc64 = ptr;
-		*loc64 = cpu_to_elf64(ehdr, elf64_to_cpu(ehdr, *loc64) + value);
+		*loc64 = cpu_to_elf64(ehdr, value);
 		break;
 	case R_AARCH64_PREL32:
 		type = "PREL32";
 		loc32 = ptr;
-		*loc32 = cpu_to_elf32(ehdr,
-			elf32_to_cpu(ehdr, *loc32) + value - address);
+		*loc32 = cpu_to_elf32(ehdr, value - address);
 		break;
 
 	/* Set a MOV[KZ] immediate field to bits [15:0] of X. No overflow check */
-- 
2.31.1