[PATCH v3 6/6] crash hp: Add x86 crash hotplug support
Eric DeVolder
eric.devolder at oracle.com
Fri Jan 21 06:06:50 PST 2022
Baoquan,
Thanks for the feedback, inline responses below!
eric
On 1/19/22 04:23, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 01/10/22 at 02:57pm, Eric DeVolder wrote:
>> For x86_64, when CPU or memory is hot un/plugged, the crash
>> elfcorehdr, which describes the CPUs and memory in the system,
>> must also be updated.
>>
>> To update the elfcorehdr for x86_64, a new elfcorehdr must be
>> generated from the available CPUs and memory. The new elfcorehdr
>> is prepared into a buffer, and if no errors occur, it is
>> installed over the top of the existing elfcorehdr.
>>
>> In the patch 'crash hp: kexec_file changes for crash hotplug support'
>> the need to update purgatory due to the change in elfcorehdr was
>> eliminated. As a result, no changes to purgatory or boot_params
>> (as the elfcorehdr= kernel command line parameter pointer
>> remains unchanged and correct) are needed, just elfcorehdr.
>>
>> To accommodate a growing number of resources via hotplug, the
>> elfcorehdr segment must be sufficiently large enough to accommodate
>> changes, see the CRASH_HOTPLUG_ELFCOREHDR_SZ configure item.
>>
>> NOTE that this supports both kexec_load and kexec_file_load. Support
>> for kexec_load is made possible by identifying the elfcorehdr segment
>> at load time and updating it as previously described. However, it is
>> the responsibility of the userspace kexec utility to ensure that:
>> - the elfcorehdr segment is sufficiently large enough to accommodate
>> hotplug changes, ala CRASH_HOTPLUG_ELFCOREHDR_SZ.
>> - provides a purgatory that excludes the elfcorehdr from its list of
>> run-time segments to check.
>> These changes to the userspace kexec utility are not yet available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder at oracle.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>> index 9730c88530fc..d185137b33d4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>> #include <linux/memblock.h>
>> +#include <linux/highmem.h>
>>
>> #include <asm/processor.h>
>> #include <asm/hardirq.h>
>> @@ -265,7 +266,8 @@ static int prepare_elf_headers(struct kimage *image, void **addr,
>> goto out;
>>
>> /* By default prepare 64bit headers */
>> - ret = crash_prepare_elf64_headers(cmem, IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64), addr, sz);
>> + ret = crash_prepare_elf64_headers(image, cmem,
>> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64), addr, sz);
>>
>> out:
>> vfree(cmem);
>> @@ -397,7 +399,17 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
>> image->elf_headers = kbuf.buffer;
>> image->elf_headers_sz = kbuf.bufsz;
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG
>> + /* Ensure elfcorehdr segment large enough for hotplug changes */
>> + kbuf.memsz = CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG_ELFCOREHDR_SZ;
>
> I would define a default value for the size, meantime provide a Kconfig
> option to allow user to customize.
In patch 2/6 of this series, "crash hp: Introduce CRASH_HOTPLUG configuration options", I provide
the following:
+config CRASH_HOTPLUG_ELFCOREHDR_SZ
+ depends on CRASH_HOTPLUG
+ int
+ default 131072
+ help
+ Specify the maximum size of the elfcorehdr buffer/segment.
which defines a default value of 128KiB, and can be overriden at configure time.
Are you asking for a different technique?
>
>> + /* For marking as usable to crash kernel */
>> + image->elf_headers_sz = kbuf.memsz;
>> + /* Record the index of the elfcorehdr segment */
>> + image->elf_index = image->nr_segments;
>> + image->elf_index_valid = true;
>> +#else
>> kbuf.memsz = kbuf.bufsz;
>> +#endif
>> kbuf.buf_align = ELF_CORE_HEADER_ALIGN;
>> kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
>> ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
>> @@ -412,3 +424,127 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG
>
> These two helper function should be carved out into a separate patch as
> a preparatory one. I am considering how to rearrange and split the
> patches, will reply to cover letter.
OK, I look forward to that insight!
>
>> +void *map_crash_pages(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long size)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * NOTE: The addresses and sizes passed to this routine have
>> + * already been fully aligned on page boundaries. There is no
>> + * need for massaging the address or size.
>> + */
>> + void *ptr = NULL;
>> +
>> + /* NOTE: requires arch_kexec_[un]protect_crashkres() for write access */
>> + if (size > 0) {
>> + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +
>> + ptr = kmap(page);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ptr;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void unmap_crash_pages(void **ptr)
>> +{
>> + if (ptr) {
>> + if (*ptr)
>> + kunmap(*ptr);
>> + *ptr = NULL;
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +void arch_crash_hotplug_handler(struct kimage *image,
>> + unsigned int hp_action, unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
>> +{
>> + /*
>> + * To accurately reflect hot un/plug changes, the elfcorehdr (which
>> + * is passed to the crash kernel via the elfcorehdr= parameter)
>> + * must be updated with the new list of CPUs and memories. The new
>> + * elfcorehdr is prepared in a kernel buffer, and if no errors,
>> + * then it is written on top of the existing/old elfcorehdr.
>> + *
>> + * Due to the change to the elfcorehdr, purgatory must explicitly
>> + * exclude the elfcorehdr from the list of segments it checks.
>> + */
>
> Please move this code comment to above function as kernel-doc if you
> this it benefits the entire function. Otherwise should move them above
> the code block they are explaining. For this place, I think moving them
> to above arch_crash_hotplug_handler() is better.
ok, I will do that!
>
>> + struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
>> + unsigned char *ptr = NULL;
>> + unsigned long elfsz = 0;
>> + void *elfbuf = NULL;
>> + unsigned long mem, memsz;
>> + unsigned int n;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * When the struct kimage is alloced, it is wiped to zero, so
>> + * the elf_index_valid defaults to false. It is set on the
>> + * kexec_file_load path, or here for kexec_load.
>> + */
>
> I think this kexec loading part should be taken out and post after this
> whole patchset being accepted. At least, it's worth to put them in a
> separate patch.
This little bit of code that identifies the incoming elfcorehdr is all that is needed to support
kexec_load (and the userspace changes of course). I'm happy to split as a separate patch, but I
would think that be maintaining it with this series, then when it is accepted, both the kexec_load
and kexec_file_load paths would be supported? Your call.
>
>> + if (!image->elf_index_valid) {
>> + for (n = 0; n < image->nr_segments; n++) {
>> + mem = image->segment[n].mem;
>> + memsz = image->segment[n].memsz;
>> + ptr = map_crash_pages(mem, memsz);
>> + if (ptr) {
>> + /* The segment containing elfcorehdr */
>> + if ((ptr[0] == 0x7F) &&
>> + (ptr[1] == 'E') &&
>> + (ptr[2] == 'L') &&
>> + (ptr[3] == 'F')) {
>
> Is this for safety checking later?
No, this code is here to support the kexec_load path; the incoming elfcorehdr has to be identified
in order to make changes to it later.
>
>> + image->elf_index = (int)n;
>> + image->elf_index_valid = true;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + unmap_crash_pages((void **)&ptr);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Must have valid elfcorehdr index */
>> + if (!image->elf_index_valid) {
>> + pr_err("crash hp: unable to locate elfcorehdr segment");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Create the new elfcorehdr reflecting the changes to CPU and/or
>> + * memory resources. The elfcorehdr segment memsz must be
>> + * sufficiently large to accommodate increases due to hotplug
>> + * activity. See CRASH_HOTPLUG_ELFCOREHDR_SZ.
>> + */
>> + if (prepare_elf_headers(image, &elfbuf, &elfsz)) {
>> + pr_err("crash hp: unable to prepare elfcore headers");
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> + ksegment = &image->segment[image->elf_index];
>> + memsz = ksegment->memsz;
>> + if (elfsz > memsz) {
>> + pr_err("crash hp: update elfcorehdr elfsz %lu > memsz %lu",
>> + elfsz, memsz);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * At this point, we are all but assured of success.
>> + * Copy new elfcorehdr into destination.
>> + */
>> + ksegment = &image->segment[image->elf_index];
>> + mem = ksegment->mem;
>> + memsz = ksegment->memsz;
>
> The ksegment and memsz have repeated assignment.
Ah, good catch! I will correct.
>
>> + ptr = map_crash_pages(mem, memsz);
>> + if (ptr) {
>> + /* Temporarily invalidate the crash image while it is replaced */
>> + xchg(&kexec_crash_image, NULL);
>> + /* Write the new elfcorehdr into memory */
>> + memcpy((void *)ptr, elfbuf, elfsz);
>> + /* The crash image is now valid once again */
>> + xchg(&kexec_crash_image, image);
>> + }
>> + unmap_crash_pages((void **)&ptr);
>> + pr_debug("crash hp: re-loaded elfcorehdr at 0x%lx\n", mem);
>> +
>> +//FIX??? somekind of cache flush perhaps?
>
> You might mean memcpy_flushcache() on x86.
Thanks, I'll look into this and hopefully use it above.
>
>
>> +
>> +out:
>> + if (elfbuf)
>> + vfree(elfbuf);
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_CRASH_HOTPLUG */
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>
>
More information about the kexec
mailing list