[PATCH v1 2/8] x86/xen: simplify xen_oldmem_pfn_is_ram()

David Hildenbrand david at redhat.com
Wed Sep 29 08:07:10 PDT 2021


On 29.09.21 16:22, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> 
> On 9/29/21 5:03 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 29.09.21 10:45, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>>
>>> Can we go one step further and do
>>>
>>>
>>> @@ -20,24 +20,11 @@ static int xen_oldmem_pfn_is_ram(unsigned long pfn)
>>>            struct xen_hvm_get_mem_type a = {
>>>                    .domid = DOMID_SELF,
>>>                    .pfn = pfn,
>>> +               .mem_type = HVMMEM_ram_rw,
>>>            };
>>> -       int ram;
>>>     -       if (HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_mem_type, &a))
>>> -               return -ENXIO;
>>> -
>>> -       switch (a.mem_type) {
>>> -       case HVMMEM_mmio_dm:
>>> -               ram = 0;
>>> -               break;
>>> -       case HVMMEM_ram_rw:
>>> -       case HVMMEM_ram_ro:
>>> -       default:
>>> -               ram = 1;
>>> -               break;
>>> -       }
>>> -
>>> -       return ram;
>>> +       HYPERVISOR_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_mem_type, &a);
>>> +       return a.mem_type != HVMMEM_mmio_dm;
> 
> 
> I was actually thinking of asking you to add another patch with pr_warn_once() here (and print error code as well). This call failing is indication of something going quite wrong and it would be good to know about this.

Will include a patch in v2, thanks!


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




More information about the kexec mailing list