[PATCH v2 1/2] s390/kexec: check the return value of ipl_report_finish
Heiko Carstens
hca at linux.ibm.com
Tue Nov 16 03:17:15 PST 2021
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 11:25:56AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> In function ipl_report_finish(), it could fail by memory allocation
> failure, so check the return value to handle the case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/ipl.h | 2 +-
> arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c | 6 ++++--
> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 5 ++++-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/ipl.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/ipl.h
> index 3f8ee257f9aa..864ab5d2890c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/ipl.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/ipl.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct ipl_report_certificate {
>
> struct kexec_buf;
> struct ipl_report *ipl_report_init(struct ipl_parameter_block *ipib);
> -void *ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report);
> +int ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report, void **ipl_buf);
> int ipl_report_free(struct ipl_report *report);
> int ipl_report_add_component(struct ipl_report *report, struct kexec_buf *kbuf,
> unsigned char flags, unsigned short cert);
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
> index e2cc35775b99..a0af0b23148d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
> @@ -2144,7 +2144,7 @@ struct ipl_report *ipl_report_init(struct ipl_parameter_block *ipib)
> return report;
> }
>
> -void *ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report)
> +int ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report, void **ipl_buf)
> {
> struct ipl_report_certificate *cert;
> struct ipl_report_component *comp;
> @@ -2195,7 +2195,9 @@ void *ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report)
> }
>
> BUG_ON(ptr > buf + report->size);
> - return buf;
> + *ipl_buf = buf;
> +
> + return 0;
This does not compile:
CC arch/s390/kernel/ipl.o
arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c: In function ‘ipl_report_finish’:
arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c:2159:24: warning: returning ‘void *’ from a function with return type ‘int’ makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
2159 | return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Anyway, before we are going to have more iterations I just applied the
patch below instead before applying your memory leak fix.
>From 78e5f268d1be775354ab83c1e039dcfacaa5e258 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <hca at linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2021 11:06:38 +0100
Subject: s390/kexec: fix return code handling
kexec_file_add_ipl_report ignores that ipl_report_finish may fail and
can return an error pointer instead of a valid pointer.
Fix this and simplify by returning NULL in case of an error and let
the only caller handle this case.
Fixes: 99feaa717e55 ("s390/kexec_file: Create ipl report and pass to next kernel")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca at linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c | 3 ++-
arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 8 +++++++-
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
index e2cc35775b99..5ad1dde23dc5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ipl.c
@@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ void *ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report)
buf = vzalloc(report->size);
if (!buf)
- return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ goto out;
ptr = buf;
memcpy(ptr, report->ipib, report->ipib->hdr.len);
@@ -2195,6 +2195,7 @@ void *ipl_report_finish(struct ipl_report *report)
}
BUG_ON(ptr > buf + report->size);
+out:
return buf;
}
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
index 528edff085d9..f0200b503f94 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ static int kexec_file_add_ipl_report(struct kimage *image,
struct kexec_buf buf;
unsigned long addr;
void *ptr, *end;
+ int ret;
buf.image = image;
@@ -199,7 +200,10 @@ static int kexec_file_add_ipl_report(struct kimage *image,
ptr += len;
}
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
buf.buffer = ipl_report_finish(data->report);
+ if (!buf.buffer)
+ goto out;
buf.bufsz = data->report->size;
buf.memsz = buf.bufsz;
@@ -209,7 +213,9 @@ static int kexec_file_add_ipl_report(struct kimage *image,
data->kernel_buf + offsetof(struct lowcore, ipl_parmblock_ptr);
*lc_ipl_parmblock_ptr = (__u32)buf.mem;
- return kexec_add_buffer(&buf);
+ ret = kexec_add_buffer(&buf);
+out:
+ return ret;
}
void *kexec_file_add_components(struct kimage *image,
--
2.31.1
More information about the kexec
mailing list