[PATCH next v1 2/3] printk: remove safe buffers
John Ogness
john.ogness at linutronix.de
Mon Mar 29 16:10:02 BST 2021
On 2021-03-29, Petr Mladek <pmladek at suse.com> wrote:
> I wonder if some console drivers rely on the fact that the write()
> callback is called with interrupts disabled.
>
> IMHO, it would be a bug when any write() callback expects that
> callers disabled the interrupts.
Agreed.
> Do you plan to remove the console-spinning stuff after offloading
> consoles to the kthreads?
Yes. Although a similar concept will be introduced to allow the threaded
printers and the atomic consoles to compete.
> Will you call console write() callback with irq enabled from the
> kthread?
No. That defeats the fundamental purpose of this entire rework
excercise. ;-)
> Anyway, we should at least add a comment why the interrupts are
> disabled.
I decided to move the local_irq_save/restore inside the console-spinning
functions and added a comment for v2.
John Ogness
More information about the kexec
mailing list