[RFC v2 4/6] fs: distinguish between user initiated freeze and kernel initiated freeze

Christoph Hellwig hch at infradead.org
Tue Apr 20 13:46:26 BST 2021

Previous message (by thread): [RFC v2 4/6] fs: distinguish between user initiated freeze and kernel initiated freeze
Next message (by thread): [RFC v2 5/6] fs: add iterate_supers_excl() and iterate_supers_reverse_excl()
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Wouldn't it be simpler to just add a new flag to signal a kernel
initiated freeze, or even better the exact reason (suspend) instead of
overloading the state machine?

Previous message (by thread): [RFC v2 4/6] fs: distinguish between user initiated freeze and kernel initiated freeze
Next message (by thread): [RFC v2 5/6] fs: add iterate_supers_excl() and iterate_supers_reverse_excl()
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the kexec mailing list