[PATCH 0/3] warn and suppress irqflood
Guilherme Piccoli
gpiccoli at canonical.com
Mon Oct 26 11:06:17 EDT 2020
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 8:12 AM Pingfan Liu <kernelfans at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:37 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22 2020 at 13:56, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > > I hit a irqflood bug on powerpc platform, and two years ago, on a x86 platform.
> > > When the bug happens, the kernel is totally occupies by irq. Currently, there
> > > may be nothing or just soft lockup warning showed in console. It is better
> > > to warn users with irq flood info.
> > >
> > > In the kdump case, the kernel can move on by suppressing the irq flood.
> >
> > You're curing the symptom not the cause and the cure is just magic and
> > can't work reliably.
> Yeah, it is magic. But at least, it is better to printk something and
> alarm users about what happens. With current code, it may show nothing
> when system hangs.
Thanks Pingfan and Thomas for the points - I'd like to have a
mechanism in the kernel to warn users when an IRQ flood is potentially
happening.
Some time ago (2 years) we faced a similar issue in x86-64, a hard to
debug problem in kdump, that eventually was narrowed to a buggy NIC FW
flooding IRQs in kdump kernel, and no messages showed (although kernel
changed a lot since that time, today we might have better IRQ
handling/warning). We tried an early-boot fix, by disabling MSIs (as
per PCI spec) early in x86 boot, but it wasn't accepted - Bjorn asked
pertinent questions that I couldn't respond (I lost the reproducer)
[0].
Cheers,
Guilherme
[0] lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20181018183721.27467-1-gpiccoli at canonical.com
More information about the kexec
mailing list