[PATCH v5 0/3] makedumpfile/arm64: Add support for ARMv8.2 extensions
Bhupesh Sharma
bhsharma at redhat.com
Thu Nov 12 01:46:26 EST 2020
Hi Kazu,
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 6:05 AM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁)
<k-hagio-ab at nec.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bhupesh,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> > Hi Bhupesh,
> >
> > sorry for my scattered comments.
> >
> > As for 1/3 and 2/3, I think we can merge them separately with 3/3, right?
> > so if you can ack the updated 1/3 I sent, I will merge them first.
> > Could you check it?
>
> Hopefully I'd like to release the next version of makedumpfile next week.
>
> So I'm going to merge the modified 1/3 patch and your 2/3 patch separately
> from 3/3, I think it can use "MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS" and reduce distribution-specific
> patches. If you have any concerns about it, please let me know.
This looks fine to me. Please feel free to merge the patchset in this way.
Regards,
Bhupesh
> > Thanks,
> > Kazu
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > > Changes since v4:
> > > ----------------
> > > - v4 can be seen here:
> > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/kexec/msg23850.html
> > > - Removed the patch (via [PATCH 4/4] in v3) which marked '--mem-usage'
> > > option as unsupported for arm64 architecture, as we now have a mechanism
> > > to read the 'vabits_actual' value from 'id_aa64mmfr2_el1' arm64 system
> > > architecture register. As per discussions with arm64 and gcc/binutils
> > > maintainers it turns out there is no standard ABI available between
> > > the kernel and user-space to export this value early enough to be used
> > > for page_offset calculation in the --mem-usage case. So, the next best
> > > option is to have the user-space read the system register to determine
> > > underlying hardware support for larger (52-bit) addressing support.
> > >
> > > This allows us to keep supporting '--mem-usage' option on arm64 even
> > > on newer kernels (with flipped VA space).
> > >
> > > Changes since v3:
> > > ----------------
> > > - v3 can be seen here:
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-March/022534.html
> > > - Added a new patch (via [PATCH 4/4]) which marks '--mem-usage' option as
> > > unsupported for arm64 architecture. With the newer arm64 kernels
> > > supporting 48-bit/52-bit VA address spaces and keeping a single
> > > binary for supporting the same, the address of
> > > kernel symbols like _stext, which could be earlier used to determine
> > > VA_BITS value, can no longer to determine whether VA_BITS is set to 48
> > > or 52 in the kernel space. Hence for now, it makes sense to mark
> > > '--mem-usage' option as unsupported for arm64 architecture until
> > > we have more clarity from arm64 kernel maintainers on how to manage
> > > the same in future kernel/makedumpfile versions.
> > >
> > > Changes since v2:
> > > ----------------
> > > - v2 can be seen here:
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-February/022456.html
> > > - I missed some comments from Kazu sent on the LVA v1 patch when I sent
> > > out the v2. So, addressing them now in v3.
> > > - Also added a patch that adds a tree-wide feature to read
> > > 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' from vmcoreinfo (if available).
> > >
> > > Changes since v1:
> > > ----------------
> > > - v1 was sent as two separate patches:
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-February/022424.html
> > > (ARMv8.2-LPA)
> > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2019-February/022425.html
> > > (ARMv8.2-LVA)
> > > - v2 combined the two in a single patchset and also addresses Kazu's
> > > review comments.
> > >
> > > This patchset adds support for ARMv8.2 extensions in makedumpfile code.
> > > I cover the following cases with this patchset:
> > > - Both old (<5.4) and new kernels (>= 5.4) work well.
> > > - All VA and PA bit combinations currently supported via the kernel
> > > CONFIG options work well, including:
> > > - 48-bit kernel VA + 52-bit PA (LPA)
> > > - 52-bit kernel VA (LVA) + 52-bit PA (LPA)
> > >
> > > This has been tested for the following user-cases:
> > > 1. Analysing page information via '--mem-usage' option.
> > > 2. Creating a dumpfile using /proc/vmcore,
> > > 3. Creating a dumpfile using /proc/kcore, and
> > > 4. Post-processing a vmcore.
> > >
> > > I have tested this patchset on the following platforms, with kernels
> > > which support/do-not-support ARMv8.2 features:
> > > 1. CPUs which don't support ARMv8.2 features, e.g. qualcomm-amberwing,
> > > ampere-osprey.
> > > 2. Prototype models which support ARMv8.2 extensions (e.g. ARMv8 FVP
> > > simulation model).
> > >
> > > Also a preparation patch has been added in this patchset which adds a
> > > common feature for archs (except arm64, for which similar support is
> > > added via subsequent patch) to retrieve 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' from
> > > vmcoreinfo (if available).
> > >
> > > This patchset ensures backward compatibility for kernel versions in
> > > which 'TCR_EL1.T1SZ' and 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' are not available in
> > > vmcoreinfo.
> > >
> > > In the newer kernels (>= 5.4.0) the following patches export these
> > > variables in the vmcoreinfo:
> > > - 1d50e5d0c505 ("crash_core, vmcoreinfo: Append 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' to vmcoreinfo")
> > > - bbdbc11804ff ("arm64/crash_core: Export TCR_EL1.T1SZ in vmcoreinfo")
> > >
> > > Cc: John Donnelly <john.p.donnelly at oracle.com>
> > > Cc: Kazuhito Hagio <k-hagio at ab.jp.nec.com>
> > > Cc: kexec at lists.infradead.org
> > >
> > > Bhupesh Sharma (3):
> > > tree-wide: Retrieve 'MAX_PHYSMEM_BITS' from vmcoreinfo (if available)
> > > makedumpfile/arm64: Add support for ARMv8.2-LPA (52-bit PA support)
> > > makedumpfile/arm64: Add support for ARMv8.2-LVA (52-bit kernel VA
> > > support)
> > >
> > > arch/arm.c | 8 +-
> > > arch/arm64.c | 520 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > > arch/ia64.c | 7 +-
> > > arch/ppc.c | 8 +-
> > > arch/ppc64.c | 49 +++--
> > > arch/s390x.c | 29 +--
> > > arch/sparc64.c | 9 +-
> > > arch/x86.c | 34 ++--
> > > arch/x86_64.c | 27 +--
> > > common.h | 10 +
> > > makedumpfile.c | 4 +-
> > > makedumpfile.h | 6 +-
> > > 12 files changed, 529 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.26.2
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kexec mailing list
> > kexec at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>
More information about the kexec
mailing list