[BUG] vmcore-dmesg cant' read dmesg log from /proc/vmcore if log_buf is reallocated due to large number of CPUs

Vadim Lomovtsev Vadim.Lomovtsev at caviumnetworks.com
Thu Oct 25 03:40:21 PDT 2018

Hello Bhupesh,

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 03:00:08AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> External Email
> Hello Vadim,
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 6:23 PM Lomovtsev, Vadim
> <Vadim.Lomovtsev at cavium.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following issue has been found for vmcore-dmesg app with latest release (94159bc3c264fa26395e56302072276a139d18af 2.0.18-rc1) of kexec-tools at CentOS 7.5 distro:
> >
> > While having systems with large number of CPUs (e.g. Cavium ThunderX2 has 224) the log_buf gets reallocated by memblock_virt_alloc() at the setup_log_buf routine (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.16.18/source/kernel/printk/printk.c#L1108).
> >
> > Then while dumping vmcore the vmcore-dmesg can't find dmesg log at /proc/vmcore file and exits with following message:
> >   Failed to read log text of size 0 bytes: Bad address
> >
> > However it (vmcore-dmesg app) reads properly the log_buf symbol, it's address and eventually it's value from /proc/vmcore but fails to find dmesg data then.
> >
> > In the same time the makedumpfile is able to find and extract dmesg buffer from /proc/vmcore.
> > The makedumpfile comes with kexec-tools-2.0.15-13.el7_5.2.aarch64 package.
> >
> > The issue is not reproduced for systems with small number of CPUs and log_buf not reallocated to memblock section.
> Seems like you are hitting a known issue we saw on qualcomm amberwing
> platforms as well.
> I have sent a patch-series titled 'kexec-tools/arm64: Add support to
> read PHYS_OFFSET from vmcoreinfo inside '/proc/kcore' to this list
> just a few minutes back.
> I have Cc'ed you to the patchset as I think it might fix the issue for
> you.

Got them, thank you.

> Kindly try the patchset on your platform (cavium?) and let me
> know if this fixes the issue for you.

Sure, I'd like to check them at my side, but..
I fall into merge conflicts while trying to apply them onto
master, kexec-tools 2.0.18-rc1 94159bc3c264fa26395e56302072276a139d18af

Are there any specific branch/revision for them to be applied ?
(or it might be my mail server issues with formatting emails).


> Thanks,
> Bhupesh

More information about the kexec mailing list