[PATCH v4 5/5] kexec: document -s, -c and -a options.
dyoung at redhat.com
Tue Mar 13 20:43:55 PDT 2018
On 03/06/18 at 02:15pm, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek at suse.de>
> kexec/kexec.8 | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/kexec/kexec.8 b/kexec/kexec.8
> index e0131b4ea827..b3543db3f413 100644
> --- a/kexec/kexec.8
> +++ b/kexec/kexec.8
> @@ -144,6 +144,21 @@ Load the new kernel for use on panic.
> Specify that the new kernel is of this
> .I type.
> +.BI \-s\ (\-\-kexec-file-syscall)
> +Specify that the new KEXEC_FILE_LOAD syscall should be used exclusively.
> +.BI \-c\ (\-\-kexec-syscall)
> +Specify that the old KEXEC_LOAD syscall should be used exclusively (the default).
> +.BI \-a\ (\-\-kexec-syscall-auto)
> +Try the new simpler KEXEC_FILE_LOAD syscall first and if it is not supported
> +fall back to the old KEXEC_LOAD interface.
> +There is no one single interface that always works. KEXEC_FILE_LOAD is required
> +on systems that use locked-down secure boot to verify the kernel signature.
> +KEXEC_LOAD is required for some kernel image formats and on architectures that
> +do not support KEXEC_FILE_LOAD.
> .B \-u\ (\-\-unload)
> Unload the current
> .B kexec
Actually while I replied this mail, I tried 'kexec -c -a' system
immediately rebooted. Also as I noted in patch 4 a 'break' is missing
so does it work on your side?
I think it need more testing.
Another question I have is not sure if '-c' is a good option letter, but
I do not have suggestion as well..
More information about the kexec