[PATCH net-next v4 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel
Rahul Lakkireddy
rahul.lakkireddy at chelsio.com
Wed Apr 18 05:31:16 PDT 2018
On Wednesday, April 04/18/18, 2018 at 11:45:46 +0530, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi Rahul,
> On 04/17/18 at 01:14pm, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > On production servers running variety of workloads over time, kernel
> > panic can happen sporadically after days or even months. It is
> > important to collect as much debug logs as possible to root cause
> > and fix the problem, that may not be easy to reproduce. Snapshot of
> > underlying hardware/firmware state (like register dump, firmware
> > logs, adapter memory, etc.), at the time of kernel panic will be very
> > helpful while debugging the culprit device driver.
> >
> > This series of patches add new generic framework that enable device
> > drivers to collect device specific snapshot of the hardware/firmware
> > state of the underlying device in the crash recovery kernel. In crash
> > recovery kernel, the collected logs are added as elf notes to
> > /proc/vmcore, which is copied by user space scripts for post-analysis.
> >
> > The sequence of actions done by device drivers to append their device
> > specific hardware/firmware logs to /proc/vmcore are as follows:
> >
> > 1. During probe (before hardware is initialized), device drivers
> > register to the vmcore module (via vmcore_add_device_dump()), with
> > callback function, along with buffer size and log name needed for
> > firmware/hardware log collection.
>
> I assumed the elf notes info should be prepared while kexec_[file_]load
> phase. But I did not read the old comment, not sure if it has been discussed
> or not.
>
We must not collect dumps in crashing kernel. Adding more things in
crash dump path risks not collecting vmcore at all. Eric had
discussed this in more detail at:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/24/319
We are safe to collect dumps in the second kernel. Each device dump
will be exported as an elf note in /proc/vmcore.
> If do this in 2nd kernel a question is driver can be loaded later than vmcore init.
Yes, drivers will add their device dumps after vmcore init.
> How to guarantee the function works if vmcore reading happens before
> the driver is loaded?
>
> Also it is possible that kdump initramfs does not contains the driver
> module.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
Yes, driver must be in initramfs if it wants to collect and add device
dump to /proc/vmcore in second kernel.
> >
> > 2. vmcore module allocates the buffer with requested size. It adds
> > an elf note and invokes the device driver's registered callback
> > function.
> >
> > 3. Device driver collects all hardware/firmware logs into the buffer
> > and returns control back to vmcore module.
> >
> > The device specific hardware/firmware logs can be seen as elf notes:
> >
> > # readelf -n /proc/vmcore
> >
> > Displaying notes found at file offset 0x00001000 with length 0x04003288:
> > Owner Data size Description
> > VMCOREDD_cxgb4_0000:02:00.4 0x02000fd8 Unknown note type: (0x00000700)
> > VMCOREDD_cxgb4_0000:04:00.4 0x02000fd8 Unknown note type: (0x00000700)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > CORE 0x00000150 NT_PRSTATUS (prstatus structure)
> > VMCOREINFO 0x0000074f Unknown note type: (0x00000000)
> >
> > Patch 1 adds API to vmcore module to allow drivers to register callback
> > to collect the device specific hardware/firmware logs. The logs will
> > be added to /proc/vmcore as elf notes.
> >
> > Patch 2 updates read and mmap logic to append device specific hardware/
> > firmware logs as elf notes.
> >
> > Patch 3 shows a cxgb4 driver example using the API to collect
> > hardware/firmware logs in crash recovery kernel, before hardware is
> > initialized.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rahul
> >
> > RFC v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/2/542
> > RFC v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/16/326
> >
[...]
Thanks,
Rahul
More information about the kexec
mailing list