[PATCH v7 01/10] kexec: exntend the semantics of kexec_iomem_for_each_line
horms at verge.net.au
Mon May 22 04:41:39 PDT 2017
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 09:18:07AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:37:04PM -0700, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 14:51 +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > The current kexec_iomem_for_each_line() counts up all the lines for which
> > > a callback function returns zero(0) or positive, and otherwise it stops
> > > further scanning.
> > > This behavior is incovenient in some cases. For instance, on arm64, we want
> > > to count up "System RAM" entries, but need to skip "reserved" entries.
> > s/exntend/extend/ and s/incovenient/inconvenient/ but other than that,
> > all ten patches
> > Tested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw at amazon.co.uk>
> Thanks a lot!
> > Simon, any chance of a 2.0.15 release once these are merged please?
> For your convenience, you can also find my patch with fixes above:
Thanks, I have applied this series with the tags from David (above)
and Pratyush (below).
Regarding releasing 2.0.15. It should have come out around the same time
as v4.11, but I entirely forgot - sorry about that. I will see about
getting it released soon with these patches included.
> > Thanks for your continued effort on this, Akashi-san. Congratulations
> > on finally getting the support merged into 4.12!
> > I've backported the final set of patches to 4.9 too. That's where I'm
> > going to be using it for the moment. In case it's useful to anyone
> > else, it's here:
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/arm64-kdump-4.9.git
> Just FYI, we, linaro, will also backport kdump to our lsk v4.4 and v4.9.
> -Takahiro AKASHI
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:52:25AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Thanks for the v7 updates. I tested this version as well, and it worked!!
> Tested-by: Pratyush Anand <panand at redhat.com>
More information about the kexec