[PATCH v5 17/32] x86/mm: Add support to access boot related data in the clear
thomas.lendacky at amd.com
Fri May 19 13:50:32 PDT 2017
On 5/18/2017 4:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 01:54:39PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> I was worried what the compiler might do when CONFIG_EFI is not set,
>> but it appears to take care of it. I'll double check though.
> There's a efi_enabled() !CONFIG_EFI version too, so should be fine.
>> I may introduce a length variable to capture data->len right after
>> paddr_next is set and then have just a single memunmap() call before
>> the if check.
>> I tried that, but calling an "__init" function (early_memremap()) from
>> a non "__init" function generated warnings. I suppose I can pass in a
>> function for the map and unmap but that looks worse to me (also the
>> unmap functions take different arguments).
> No, the other way around: the __init function should call the non-init
> one and you need the non-init one anyway for memremap_is_setup_data().
The "worker" function would be doing the loop through the setup data,
but since the setup data is mapped inside the loop I can't do the __init
calling the non-init function and still hope to consolidate the code.
Maybe I'm missing something here...
>> This is like the chicken and the egg scenario. In order to determine if
>> an address is setup data I have to explicitly map the setup data chain
>> as decrypted. In order to do that I have to supply a flag to explicitly
>> map the data decrypted otherwise I wind up back in the
>> memremap_is_setup_data() function again and again and again...
> Oh, fun.
More information about the kexec