[Makedumpfile PATCH 0/2] Fix refiltering when kaslr enabled
Pratyush Anand
panand at redhat.com
Thu May 11 19:43:20 PDT 2017
Hi Atsushi,
Thanks for the testing.
On Wednesday 10 May 2017 01:37 PM, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
>> Hi Atsushi,
>>
>> On Friday 28 April 2017 12:22 PM, Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
>>> Hello Pratyush,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your report, I have received this.
>>> I'm on vacation until Mar 8, I'll review it when I return from vacation.
>>
>> Any further comment on it?
>> Otherwise, I will send a v2 after accommodating concern from Xunlei.
>
> Unfortunately, it doesn't seem like I can make time anymore for review this week,
> but at least this patch doesn't seem to work in my environment (linux 4.8 without kaslr).
> Do you have any ideas ?
I see, why it would have caused. I have not tested this case, but I hope my v2
should not have this issue.
~Pratyush
>
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x00007ffff6be49f5 in fseek () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install bzip2-libs-1.0.6-13.el7.x86_64 elfutils-libelf-0.163-3.el7.x86_64 elfutils-libs-0.163-3.el7.x86_64 glibc-2.17-105.el7.x86_64 libgcc-4.8.5-4.el7.x86_64 libstdc++-4.8.5-4.el7.x86_64 snappy-1.1.0-3.el7.x86_64 xz-libs-5.1.2-12alpha.el7.x86_64 zlib-1.2.7-15.el7.x86_64
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x00007ffff6be49f5 in fseek () from /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1 0x0000000000429d38 in read_vmcoreinfo_symbol (str_symbol=0x44cb0c "SYMBOL(_stext)=") at makedumpfile.c:2384
> #2 0x000000000042097a in get_kaslr_offset_x86_64 (vaddr=18446744071589596288) at arch/x86_64.c:45
> #3 0x0000000000414310 in resolve_config_entry (ce=0x701370, base_vaddr=<optimized out>, base_struct_name=0x0)
> at erase_info.c:1091
> #4 0x0000000000415a89 in get_config_symbol_addr (base_struct_name=0x0, base_vaddr=0, ce=0x701370) at erase_info.c:1264
> #5 update_filter_info (filter_symbol=0x701370, size_symbol=0x701430) at erase_info.c:1579
> #6 0x0000000000416543 in process_config (config=<optimized out>) at erase_info.c:1789
> #7 process_config_file (name_config=<optimized out>) at erase_info.c:1862
> #8 0x0000000000417c57 in gather_filter_info () at erase_info.c:2356
> #9 0x0000000000443ccb in create_dumpfile () at makedumpfile.c:9863
> #10 0x000000000044561e in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at makedumpfile.c:11342
> (gdb)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Atsushi Kumagai
>
>> ~Pratyush
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Atsushi Kumagai
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> We came across another failure in makedumpfile when kaslr is enabled. This
>>>> failure occurs when we try re-filtering. We try to erase some symbol from a
>>>> dumpfile which was copied/compressed from /proc/vmcore using makedumpfile.
>>>>
>>>> We have very limited symbol information in vmcoreinfo. So symbols to be
>>>> erased may not be available in vmcoreinfo and we look for it in vmlinux.
>>>> However, symbol address from vmlinux is a static address which differs
>>> >from run time address with KASLR_OFFSET. Therefore, reading any "virtual
>>>> address of vmlinux" from vmcore is not possible.
>>>>
>>>> These patches finds runtime KASLR offset and then calculates run time
>>>> address of symbols read from vmlinux.
>>>>
>>>> Since, I am not an expert of x86, and these patches touch x86 part of
>>>> makedumpfile, therefore I have CCed x86 experts. Please, provide your
>>>> review comment and let me know if you think there could have been a better
>>>> way to resolve this issue.
>>>>
>>>> thanks
>>>>
>>>> ~Pratyush
>>>>
>>>> Pratyush Anand (2):
>>>> makedumpfile: add runtime kaslr offset if it exists
>>>> x86_64: calculate page_offset in case of re-filtering
>>>>
>>>> arch/x86_64.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> erase_info.c | 1 +
>>>> makedumpfile.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> makedumpfile.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>> 4 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.9.3
>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
>
More information about the kexec
mailing list